O'MELEY A SEA EAGLE
- Thread starter gomanly
- Start date
First Grader
O'MELEY A SEA EAGLE
That combined with Tuqiri should kick off a "salary cap breach" investigation.
Imagine it............Souths..the new Silvertails :lol:
That combined with Tuqiri should kick off a "salary cap breach" investigation.
Imagine it............Souths..the new Silvertails :lol:
O'MELEY A SEA EAGLE
Now I know how you got your surname.
It is all a smokescreen as we are really after jason Ryles from the dragqueens.
Apprantly Dessie would like the idea of 2 jason's in his front row. I ha drinks with sherlock on the weekend and he assured me that this is true. he also wants Luke O'Donnell so that he can have 2 Luke's in the seond row (with Willo).
Now I know how you got your surname.
It is all a smokescreen as we are really after jason Ryles from the dragqueens.
Apprantly Dessie would like the idea of 2 jason's in his front row. I ha drinks with sherlock on the weekend and he assured me that this is true. he also wants Luke O'Donnell so that he can have 2 Luke's in the seond row (with Willo).
First Grader
O'MELEY A SEA EAGLE
I have it on good authority that Ryan is about to sign Omeley & one other from Canterbury, that would be.............wait for it......................................
2 Dogs 8|
I have it on good authority that Ryan is about to sign Omeley & one other from Canterbury, that would be.............wait for it......................................
2 Dogs 8|
G
Guest
Guest
O'MELEY A SEA EAGLE
We could then have O'Meley on the wing with Cuthbo.
We could then have O'Meley on the wing with Cuthbo.
G
Guest
Guest
O'MELEY A SEA EAGLE
I reckon that we should go for danny Wicks the young prop from the dragqueens. he would be heaps cheaper and we could have him for many years
I reckon that we should go for danny Wicks the young prop from the dragqueens. he would be heaps cheaper and we could have him for many years
Bencher
O'MELEY A SEA EAGLE
Danny Wicks. But yeah, good choice. Was great in his first few games last year - looked the real deal. Had some problems giving away penalties towards the end of the year - obviously spending too much time with Ryles and not enough time with Bailey.
Danny Wicks. But yeah, good choice. Was great in his first few games last year - looked the real deal. Had some problems giving away penalties towards the end of the year - obviously spending too much time with Ryles and not enough time with Bailey.
First Grader
O'MELEY A SEA EAGLE
Heres a snippet from Petro Civenicivas manager Philips..........
"I think $350,000 a season is a realistic figure for a guy of Petero's stature. Mark O'Meley (Bulldogs Test prop) is looking for around $400,000 so that's the market value for a leading prop in the game"
All this talk about an offer from us of $500k is funny stuff.
Heres a snippet from Petro Civenicivas manager Philips..........
"I think $350,000 a season is a realistic figure for a guy of Petero's stature. Mark O'Meley (Bulldogs Test prop) is looking for around $400,000 so that's the market value for a leading prop in the game"
All this talk about an offer from us of $500k is funny stuff.
Winging it
O'MELEY A SEA EAGLE
I think O'Meley is on about 300k and supposedly the dogs can't manage that with the SBW signing. At anything up to 400k there will be a line around the corner at Phillip Street waiting to lodge a contract. Realsitically he will be a bit over 400k, and 500k is a joke.
I think O'Meley is on about 300k and supposedly the dogs can't manage that with the SBW signing. At anything up to 400k there will be a line around the corner at Phillip Street waiting to lodge a contract. Realsitically he will be a bit over 400k, and 500k is a joke.
First Grader
O'MELEY A SEA EAGLE
Steve Bell's nickname is Beaver. We do have two of them!!! :dance: :dance:
| Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
3 | 3 | 0 | 35 | 6 |
|
3 | 3 | 0 | 32 | 6 |
|
2 | 2 | 0 | 29 | 6 |
|
3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 4 |
|
2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
|
3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
|
3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
|
3 | 2 | 1 | -7 | 4 |
|
2 | 1 | 1 | -8 | 4 |
|
3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
3 | 1 | 2 | -3 | 2 |
|
3 | 1 | 2 | -9 | 2 |
|
3 | 1 | 2 | -14 | 2 |
|
3 | 1 | 2 | -22 | 2 |
|
3 | 1 | 2 | -25 | 2 |
|
3 | 0 | 3 | -12 | 0 |
|
3 | 0 | 3 | -18 | 0 |
