Obstruction

[fLIP]

NRL on fox had Bill Harrigon on last night to talk about the obstruction rulings that seem to change from game to game.

As most people would know the refs have a review of every game and performance after the weekend and put a report to clubs on bad decisions ect.

Turns out that our obstruction in the first half last week that saw burns going to score under the posts was not an obstruction at all and had no indication of being so. The refs have admitted to making the mistake.

We would have gone up 10 - 0 because it was under the posts.

Could have cost us the game? :doh:
:doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh:

 

[DSM5]

Harrigon also stated that decisions on obstruction such as Burns would have been sent to the video ref if he had of scored. The ref was a bonehead not to have let the game flow for a further three seconds, Burns scores, then gone to the video ref. His stupidity could have cost us the points.

 

[mellonhead]

But will the refs get better? me thinks NO!