ERNIE FOR NO7
Reserve Grader
That is BS , Jared was offered by the same amount as GALUVAO got.clontaago link said:Ryan, Hargraves took off for cash, no other reason.
That is BS , Jared was offered by the same amount as GALUVAO got.clontaago link said:Ryan, Hargraves took off for cash, no other reason.
That is BS , Jared was offered by the same amount as GALUVAO got.ERNIE FOR NO7 link said:[quote author=clontaago link=topic=182592.msg254111#msg254111 date=1268343188]
Ryan, Hargraves took off for cash, no other reason.
Canteen Worker link said:How many players have left Manly of late and gone on to be superstars elsewhere??? My mind is that Des has the best information and is in the best position to make the call. He has one premiership under his belt.
Canteen Worker link said:Des is criticized for being 'risk averse' and failure to experiment. Others call the same thing blooding youngsters and bringing them on steadily and showing loyalty to his players. (First graders tend to like that and show loyalty to the coach in return).
Glenn Stewart was slow to play first grade but he hasn't disappointed since then. I am not sure that Des has made too many mistakes over the years.
Are there seriously guys on this site who are advocating their current bosses replace them for an up-and-comer in their workplace who has potential, just so he can stay with the company? Or do they have to earn their 'spurs' and justify their inclusion?
How many players have left Manly of late and gone on to be superstars elsewhere??? My mind is that Des has the best information and is in the best position to make the call. He has one premiership under his belt.
Whilst my personal view is that Hodkinson might be a star and that his kicking game will guarantee us good field position, maybe Des is picking the best 13 and playing to the team's strengths.
That is BS , Jared was offered by the same amount as GALUVAO got.ERNIE FOR NO7 link said:[quote author=clontaago link=topic=182592.msg254111#msg254111 date=1268343188]
Ryan, Hargraves took off for cash, no other reason.
 You can tell you're a Baby Boomer. In some places, particularly the public service, there's no doubt getting rid of some of the dead wood at the top of the tree and allowing the energetic and risk-taking fellows to take precedence would be no bad thing.Canteen Worker link said:Are there seriously guys on this site who are advocating their current bosses replace them for an up-and-comer in their workplace who has potential, just so he can stay with the company? Or do they have to earn their 'spurs' and justify their inclusion?
 You can tell you're a Baby Boomer. In some places, particularly the public service, there's no doubt getting rid of some of the dead wood at the top of the tree and allowing the energetic and risk-taking fellows to take precedence would be no bad thing.Matabele link said:[quote author=Canteen Worker link=topic=182592.msg254260#msg254260 date=1268450026]
Are there seriously guys on this site who are advocating their current bosses replace them for an up-and-comer in their workplace who has potential, just so he can stay with the company? Or do they have to earn their 'spurs' and justify their inclusion?
Canteen Worker link said:Des is criticized for being 'risk averse' and failure to experiment. Others call the same thing blooding youngsters and bringing them on steadily and showing loyalty to his players. (First graders tend to like that and show loyalty to the coach in return).
Glenn Stewart was slow to play first grade but he hasn't disappointed since then. I am not sure that Des has made too many mistakes over the years.
Are there seriously guys on this site who are advocating their current bosses replace them for an up-and-comer in their workplace who has potential, just so he can stay with the company? Or do they have to earn their 'spurs' and justify their inclusion?
How many players have left Manly of late and gone on to be superstars elsewhere??? My mind is that Des has the best information and is in the best position to make the call. He has one premiership under his belt.
Whilst my personal view is that Hodkinson might be a star and that his kicking game will guarantee us good field position, maybe Des is picking the best 13 and playing to the team's strengths.
Matabele link said:So we've shifted a fellow who has proved world-leading in one position sideways into one he;s reluctant to fulfill (Lyon). And shifted a fellow who showed promise in that position last year into a position he has little or no experience in (Foran). In doing so, weakening one position to strengthen another, twice over.
And the fellow bought in to cover the world leader is a fellow who was sacked last year.Â
Does this result in a balanced team structure?
Matabele link said:So we've shifted a fellow who has proved world-leading in one position sideways into one he;s reluctant to fulfill (Lyon).Â
what r your motives for being so negative all the time?Matabele link said:So we've shifted a fellow who has proved world-leading in one position sideways into one he;s reluctant to fulfill (Lyon). And shifted a fellow who showed promise in that position last year into a position he has little or no experience in (Foran). In doing so, weakening one position to strengthen another, twice over.
And the fellow bought in to cover the world leader is a fellow who was sacked last year.Â
Does this result in a balanced team structure?
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
2 | Warriors | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
3 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
4 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
6 | Sharks | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 49 | 10 |
7 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 10 |
8 | Tigers | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 10 |
9 | Cowboys | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -14 | 10 |
10 | Dragons | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -14 | 8 |
11 | Roosters | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -42 | 8 |
12 | Knights | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -48 | 8 |
13 | Rabbitohs | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -70 | 8 |
14 | Dolphins | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
15 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
16 | Eels | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -117 | 6 |
17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |