brad
First Grader
My mate said they are chasing Moa and Taylor, time will tell again.Is that a guess because previously you've been pretty spot on.
My mate said they are chasing Moa and Taylor, time will tell again.Is that a guess because previously you've been pretty spot on.
You'd rather Willow???Oh dear, that will be a dark day !!
That's a toughy..Here is a question for all'a y'all:
Same money - Lussick or Mateo for two years?
@The Who why are you limiting the choice of assistant coaches to those 2 coaching nevils. I know they are manly men and they may well be both great blokes, but in coaching ranks what success do they have? Wow If the Penn's want excellence, they hardly would be encouraging sponsors or fans of their plans, if they follow some great new signings by appointing either Brett Fulton or Willow to the helm. Lets hope they can look beyond the peninsula and the Bozo nepotism problem, if they are serious about bringing success.You'd rather Willow???
That doesn't make any sense.. How can we say we're announcing two additional players if Lussick signing depends on player movement.. And I thought we would of had more funds as we are not resigning a heap off off contract players??Who will sign Burgess and Mateo?
Burgess has 1 more year but Mateo has 2 more.
The Lussick signing is meant to be dependent on these guys moving on.
No one would pay for Lussick either, so time will tell as to his value to the Manly ranks
Here is a question for all'a y'all:
Same money - Lussick or Mateo for two years?
@The Who why are you limiting the choice of assistant coaches to those 2 coaching nevils. I know they are manly men and they may well be both great blokes, but in coaching ranks what success do they have? Wow If the Penn's want excellence, they hardly would be encouraging sponsors or fans of their plans, if they follow some great new signings by appointing either Brett Fulton or Willow to the helm. Lets hope they can look beyond the peninsula and the Bozo nepotism problem, if they are serious about bringing success.
I feel like Mateo can take a hit up that drags 3 or 4 people along AND pop an offload. Can Lussick do that?Mateo hands down. Lussick has no where near the potential to spark the creative genius mateo holds. Mateo has been fantastic since coming back from injury. We dont need the overly aggressive attitude and penalties that lussick brings. And we definitely dont need him if we can get Moa. Honestly not keen on Lussick at all so many people here are praying we get him like he's some sort of game changer. Average forward with too many penalties in his game for me.
The thought of Griffin in the coaching box scares me.It means he's only one step away from the head jobI wouldnt mind anthony griffin as assistant coach
why would you buy taylor over the hill and gone away too slow and a handicap just ask the titansIs that a guess because previously you've been pretty spot on.
Lucky him!The thought of Griffin in the coaching box scares me.It means he's only one step away from the head job
I believe he's referring to Ashley from the broncos.why would you buy taylor over the hill and gone away too slow and a handicap just ask the titans
Young Taylor from the broncos . Half 5/8.why would you buy taylor over the hill and gone away too slow and a handicap just ask the titans
Mateo is a sloth, takes about half an hour to get up after being tackled, does f$&k all hard yards, and more of his off loads go to ground or to someone in a worse position then his..... It was a poor signing from the start, no one will take it off our hands... We are stuck with the fat mess.
Lussick is not seen as a Major signing.That doesn't make any sense.. How can we say we're announcing two additional players if Lussick signing depends on player movement.. And I thought we would of had more funds as we are not resigning a heap off off contract players??
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | 5 | 1 | 59 | 12 | |
6 | 5 | 1 | 20 | 12 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 53 | 10 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 30 | 10 | |
7 | 4 | 2 | 25 | 9 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | 40 | 8 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 8 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | -8 | 8 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | -18 | 8 | |
7 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 7 | |
7 | 3 | 4 | 31 | 6 | |
7 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 6 | |
6 | 2 | 4 | -31 | 6 | |
7 | 3 | 4 | -41 | 6 | |
7 | 2 | 5 | -29 | 4 | |
6 | 1 | 5 | -102 | 4 | |
6 | 0 | 6 | -90 | 2 |