Negative, or Perceptive?

Crocker is the only one of those 5 anywhere near top flight.

especially considering the rest of the ones they developed themselves.

I hope Donnely was in there as a laugh 🙂
 
[quote author=byso]
Why would you be interested in my reply? 8|

Because you questioned some of Des Haslers "calls" early on mate. There's no hidden agenda here. FFS. :doh:
[/quote]

Bellamy is a better coach.

Our team is based on low mistakes and good defence. This will win many games but I think some more creativity is required.

I also think Dessie would be a little dissapointed spending 450K on just a high quality centre.
 
Crocker is the only one of those 5 anywhere near top flight.

especially considering the rest of the ones they developed themselves.

I hope Donnely was in there as a laugh 🙂

Crocker , cross and kidwell were all fairly top siginings, cross is just getting back from injury but starting to play well again
 
kidwell was an honest first grader at best.

Cross is going well now I agree but was hardly a wolrd beater previously
 
[quote author=Ryan]
[quote author=byso]
Why would you be interested in my reply? 8|

Because you questioned some of Des Haslers "calls" early on mate. There's no hidden agenda here. FFS. :doh:
[/quote]

Bellamy is a better coach.

Our team is based on low mistakes and good defence. This will win many games but I think some more creativity is required.

I also think Dessie would be a little dissapointed spending 450K on just a high quality centre.
[/quote]

Fair calls. I think Crushers being close friends with Lyon has a lot to do with the team bending to fit in with what Lyon wants.

He (Lyon) was untested as a 5/8. TWO games in the ESL, and they swapped him straight back to the centres when that guy who bagged our beaches out returned from injury. I think Des is taking a huge gamble displacing Burns for him.

Also, a centre doesn't always have to be a centre. Lyon can get involved by coming in field when he wants.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 17 14 0 3 108 32
2 Storm 16 12 0 4 220 30
3 Bulldogs 16 12 0 4 96 30
4 Warriors 16 11 0 5 31 28
5 Broncos 17 10 0 7 80 26
6 Panthers 17 9 1 7 45 25
7 Sharks 18 10 0 8 21 24
8 Dolphins 18 9 0 9 169 22
9 Sea Eagles 16 8 0 8 58 22
10 Roosters 17 8 0 9 8 22
11 Dragons 16 6 0 10 -56 18
12 Cowboys 18 6 1 11 -163 17
13 Knights 17 6 0 11 -85 16
14 Tigers 17 6 0 11 -102 16
15 Eels 16 5 0 11 -125 16
16 Rabbitohs 18 6 0 12 -149 16
17 Titans 16 4 0 12 -156 14
Back
Top Bottom