Negative, or Perceptive?

Crocker is the only one of those 5 anywhere near top flight.

especially considering the rest of the ones they developed themselves.

I hope Donnely was in there as a laugh 🙂
 
[quote author=byso]
Why would you be interested in my reply? 8|

Because you questioned some of Des Haslers "calls" early on mate. There's no hidden agenda here. FFS. :doh:
[/quote]

Bellamy is a better coach.

Our team is based on low mistakes and good defence. This will win many games but I think some more creativity is required.

I also think Dessie would be a little dissapointed spending 450K on just a high quality centre.
 
Crocker is the only one of those 5 anywhere near top flight.

especially considering the rest of the ones they developed themselves.

I hope Donnely was in there as a laugh 🙂

Crocker , cross and kidwell were all fairly top siginings, cross is just getting back from injury but starting to play well again
 
kidwell was an honest first grader at best.

Cross is going well now I agree but was hardly a wolrd beater previously
 
[quote author=Ryan]
[quote author=byso]
Why would you be interested in my reply? 8|

Because you questioned some of Des Haslers "calls" early on mate. There's no hidden agenda here. FFS. :doh:
[/quote]

Bellamy is a better coach.

Our team is based on low mistakes and good defence. This will win many games but I think some more creativity is required.

I also think Dessie would be a little dissapointed spending 450K on just a high quality centre.
[/quote]

Fair calls. I think Crushers being close friends with Lyon has a lot to do with the team bending to fit in with what Lyon wants.

He (Lyon) was untested as a 5/8. TWO games in the ESL, and they swapped him straight back to the centres when that guy who bagged our beaches out returned from injury. I think Des is taking a huge gamble displacing Burns for him.

Also, a centre doesn't always have to be a centre. Lyon can get involved by coming in field when he wants.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 24 19 0 5 148 44
2 Storm 24 17 0 7 212 40
3 Bulldogs 24 16 0 8 120 38
4 Broncos 24 15 0 9 172 36
5 Sharks 24 15 0 9 109 36
6 Warriors 24 14 0 10 21 34
7 Panthers 24 13 1 10 107 33
8 Roosters 24 13 0 11 132 32
9 Dolphins 24 12 0 12 125 30
10 Sea Eagles 24 12 0 12 21 30
11 Eels 24 10 0 14 -76 26
12 Cowboys 24 9 1 14 -146 25
13 Tigers 24 9 0 15 -135 24
14 Rabbitohs 24 9 0 15 -181 24
15 Dragons 24 8 0 16 -130 22
16 Titans 24 6 0 18 -199 18
17 Knights 24 6 0 18 -300 18
Back
Top Bottom