eagleron
Bencher
Been gone for a while mate, we've had our fair share over the past five years or soI guess the "no dickhead policy" is out the window then.
Been gone for a while mate, we've had our fair share over the past five years or soI guess the "no dickhead policy" is out the window then.
The problem is he is cheap but he is not a premiership winning champion and this is why the Ruthless Roosters that want to win another premiership let him go feathered friendWhen it's all said and done, Lodge on his day is a quality battering ram and doesn't take a backward step. He's cheap, so what's the problem.
$1000 a game for the rest of 2023.I can't believe I'm reading some of this positive bullshiite about lodge ...
"just what we need" ... "take no prisoners" .... "Enforcer" .... "forward leader"
Balderdash, rubbish and pig's TIT !!
Can somebody please tell me one club who's performance's he was instrumental in improving ....
... and when you fail at that .... tell me why you think he will suddenly be able to do it for Manly ???
PSS We may well need all these qualities in a forward ... but I don't think Lodge is the bloke that has them ..
Love how you manipulate and skew Silvertail comments to fit your own twisted narrative Bozo, fact1 he is a cheap signing, fact2 Roosters let him go because he wasn't playing 1st grade anymore and fact3 so he was part of a team that got the spoon, doesn't make him a bad player, he was just one of 30 in the end.The problem is he is cheap but he is not a premiership winning champion and this is why the Ruthless Roosters that want to win another premiership let him go feathered friend
Mathew Lodge was part of the Seibold /Broncos Wooden team spoon disaster in 2020
$1000 a game for the rest of 2023.
May or may not play a FG game.
May or may not be signed for 2024.
I’ll reserve my judgement until , or if , the latter happens.
I wonder if the Trbjevic’s and DCE were consulted prior to this signing?I know at this stage he’s only on a train and trial contract,but I’d be surprised if he was signed for at least next year.I’ve given Seibold the benefit of the doubt thus far,but Lodge’s appearance at Manly has left a very sour tasteSo let me get this straight. Manly thinks the club would be better with Matt Lodge as a part of the playing roster. Why?
There have been three clubs (and at least two of those have improved significantly without him on their team) that have decided they would be better off without him. And not only that happy to pay to get rid of him!
But hey...things will be different at Manly right? Right?
I don't care if we have got him for free. He is not a good NRL player, and he is obviously a bad teammate. And I haven't even touched on his terrible past.
One of the worst decisions in Manly history to give this guy a contract.
No way he’s the new BK, he was a once in a lifetime pick up.Mate ... If the Tnuc was half as good as his cheer squad on here think he is .... or delivers 1/10 of their imagined forward leadership .... it wouldn't matter how much you were paying him ...
I don't care whether we are paying him $1000 or $1,000,000 ... I just think people are dreaming if they think this bloke is the new Ben Kennedy ..
I'm sure he will ignore the voices in his head for the next 7 weeks and be a wonderful role model ... and I'm certain he is practising all the right things to say ....
But character will show in the end ...
So you are comparing a player who has never had any rep honours that I am aware of againstJust what we need no more mr nice guy, Another Spud, Rambo, Choc, BK, Roberts won't do any harm at all Im innnnn
well, ones things for sure. he cant fight for ****.
Lol nrl club and no dickhead policy don’t really go together.I thought our club was about having a no dick heads policy?
This signing is sending a bad signal and I cannot understand why the club is not retaining quality young players!!
When was the last time the “winning at all costs ruthless roosters” missed the 8? Looking like it this year. Lodge may be one part of what’s happening there but he ain’t the only issue.And when was the last time the Wining at all cost Ruthless Roosters let a winner go mid season
I am with you on this perspective view feathered friend @Woodsie
The chickens have spine issues at half and hooker, while their fullback is having a very ordinary season. Don’t think lodge was the issue over at BondiWhen was the last time the “winning at all costs ruthless roosters” missed the 8? Looking like it this year. Lodge may be one part of what’s happening there but he ain’t the only issue.
Tedesco and his form is a big part of thatThe chickens have spine issues at half and hooker, while their fullback is having a very ordinary season. Don’t think lodge was the issue over at Bondi
Come on mate, tell us what you really think.I can't believe I'm reading some of this positive bullshiite about lodge ...
"just what we need" ... "take no prisoners" .... "Enforcer" .... "forward leader"
Balderdash, rubbish and pig's TIT !!
Can somebody please tell me one club who's performance's he was instrumental in improving ....
... and when you fail at that .... tell me why you think he will suddenly be able to do it for Manly ???
PSS We may well need all these qualities in a forward ... but I don't think Lodge is the bloke that has them ..
And we have a winner!Lol nrl club and no dickhead policy don’t really go together.
Just as a matter of interest , do you think criminals can change and do better in their lives ???Not sure why the chairman is so easily manipulated by the Moses brother agents to allow this to happen.
A disgusting convicted criminal waltzes through the door when cultural issues have already been an issue for the club the last couple of years?
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |