Matai, Stewart, Foran...

[Wombat64]

Please change your avatar immediately as I feel sick

Me too ...... he is gross.

 

[Rex]

Not sure what stats you are looking at, NRLstats has 4 runs for 24m. Seems a rather big difference

The NRL stats show Foran had 16 runs for 143 metres - which is the most for any Manly player by some margin. And that's the way it looked on the field too.

 

[Fluffy]

The NRL stats show Foran had 16 runs for 143 metres - which is the most for any Manly player by some margin. And that's the way it looked on the field too.

I must be missing something then. It looks like they have updated to 6 runs for 84m but I cannot see 16 for 143.

http://live.nrlstats.com/matches/nrl/match34908.html

 

[HappilyManly]

On the NRL App it shows 143

Also another 50 odd for Snake. Most fb are closer to 200 a game 😕

 

[BOZO]

Me too ...... he is gross.

Don't change your avatar Wombat . Some of us on here love Zorba

 

[BOZO]

The NRL stats show Foran had 16 runs for 143 metres - which is the most for any Manly player by some margin. And that's the way it looked on the field too.

Most of our forwards didn't even make 43 metres

 

[Rex]

I must be missing something then. It looks like they have updated to 6 runs for 84m but I cannot see 16 for 143.

http://live.nrlstats.com/matches/nrl/match34908.html

That explains it Fluffy. We're talking about two different sites. Mine was nrl.com, not nrlstats.com. Quite like the stats your site covers.

https://matchcentre.nrl.com/match/2015/111/20151111310/#player-stats

 

[Jerry1]

Not sure what stats you are looking at, NRLstats has 4 runs for 24m. Seems a rather big difference

Foran 14 runs 136 meters on my system (rugby league live).

 

[tookey]

On the NRL App it shows 143

Also another 50 odd for Snake. Most fb are closer to 200 a game 😕

Stats are like referees - both have no credibility

 

[HoldenV8]

The stats from the NRL match centre showed Foran had ran for 166 metres on Friday night. Now they are showing he ran for 143.

Can I have a bid for 110? 98 maybe? Ok, how about 62?