Mum? Is that you?
WESTIE said:Let’s see some initiative by the RLIC...seeing as some clubs, ours included, have been named regarding their sports science units being " raided", once they have collected the information they are after, then how about either announcing them as either clear of any wrong doing ASAP.....???? We were apparently the first club who's computers and offices were also forensically investigated re salary cap audit and no announcement since to my knowledge...Wouldn't it be in the NRL's interest to be clearing clubs in this instance , as they go, instead of allowing all clubs to be placed under this black cloud of controversy ?? Would a club have any grounds to sue should it be found that they are innocent of any of these claims, and the NRL sat on this info, allowing conjecture to remain and thus causing further unnecessary damage to "the brand" ??
swoop said:One question needs to be answered and that is:
Why did they announce that Manly, Penrith and Cronulla was going to be audited giving other clubs time to "dispose of documents and stuff'?
There answer will be because Dank worked at those clubs.
I find it a bit strange that they didn't raid all clubs without notice if the level of corruption and drug abuse is a bad as they say!
mickqld said:swoop said:One question needs to be answered and that is:
Why did they announce that Manly, Penrith and Cronulla was going to be audited giving other clubs time to "dispose of documents and stuff'?
There answer will be because Dank worked at those clubs.
I find it a bit strange that they didn't raid all clubs without notice if the level of corruption and drug abuse is a bad as they say!
Because those 3 clubs are disposable. The NRL would love to ditch those teams in favour of either Perth, Central Coast, New Zealand, central Qld or a 2nd Brisbane side. It's certainly no coincidence.
Have not seen any mention of Canterbury, Saints,Parra,Souths,Tigers,Rorters what a surpirise.
Earnie the Eagle said:mickqld said:swoop said:One question needs to be answered and that is:
Why did they announce that Manly, Penrith and Cronulla was going to be audited giving other clubs time to "dispose of documents and stuff'?
There answer will be because Dank worked at those clubs.
I find it a bit strange that they didn't raid all clubs without notice if the level of corruption and drug abuse is a bad as they say!
Because those 3 clubs are disposable. The NRL would love to ditch those teams in favour of either Perth, Central Coast, New Zealand, central Qld or a 2nd Brisbane side. It's certainly no coincidence.
Have not seen any mention of Canterbury, Saints,Parra,Souths,Tigers,Rorters what a surpirise.
The Scumdogs have more to worry about than we do, remember the Tandy affair. Greenturds response to this doesnt have his normal air of confidence or arrogance if you like, it also seems that he has Des on a tight dog lead or muzzled, that alone makes me suspicious.
mickqld said:I dont think so. Constant media reports on tv and news are referring to Manly. tv are constantly showing Manly games including the 2008 grand final in a fuzzy background during reports on this as if anyone wouldn't know it was us. I have a very very bad feeling about the outcomes of all this.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
3 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
4 | Warriors | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
6 | Cowboys | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -10 | 10 |
7 | Sharks | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 39 | 8 |
8 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 8 |
9 | Tigers | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 8 |
10 | Dragons | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -8 | 8 |
11 | Rabbitohs | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -44 | 8 |
12 | Dolphins | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 6 |
13 | Roosters | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 6 |
14 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
15 | Knights | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -74 | 6 |
16 | Eels | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -107 | 6 |
17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |