Our 50 pokies at the north Manly bowlo will rake in a motza.Gee those pokies are a bottomless pit of money aren't they. $10mil and they aren't even going to blink an eye by the looks.
Our 50 pokies at the north Manly bowlo will rake in a motza.Gee those pokies are a bottomless pit of money aren't they. $10mil and they aren't even going to blink an eye by the looks.
I don't agree they are an ordinary team on paper.this is a very ordinary team on paper and yet they have done incredibly well
I remember this too. So, there will be more than 12 points deducted?The Parra managers deemed responsible for the fraud are still there despite the League's instructions that they should be gone before Parra can start to accrue points again.
Books? What books?So is the 10 million on the books?
The Parra managers deemed responsible for the fraud are still there despite the League's instructions that they should be gone before Parra can start to accrue points again.
I remember this too. So, there will be more than 12 points deducted?
Books? What books?
Yep, they only had to become Salary Cap Compliant to accrue points again as per the excerpts from the following NRL.com articles:I thought that they only had to be under the cap before they could start accruing points again.
The Parra managers deemed responsible for the fraud are still there despite the League's instructions that they should be gone before Parra can start to accrue points again.
I remember this too. So, there will be more than 12 points deducted?
Books? What books?
Please show me where it said that as damned if I can find that statement anywhere and the first two articles that I put excerpts from in my previous post are the first two put out by the NRL, the first being the media statement and the second being from when Greenturd opened his address to the media at the announcement that the Parramatta Eels would be stripped of all competition points while non-salary cap compliant.If you go back and see the original statement made by greenturd,he did say that all 5 members had to go before they could start accumulating points as well as being under the cap.
http://www.theroar.com.au/2016/05/06/nrl-backs-down-on-eels-directors-stance/I thought that they only had to be under the cap before they could start accruing points again.
It's a sideshow alright. In the biggest circus in the place. And greenturd is the ringmaster of the nrl clowns....http://www.theroar.com.au/2016/05/06/nrl-backs-down-on-eels-directors-stance/
NRL backs down on Eels directors stance
By James MacSmith | 6 May 2016
Have your say19 Comments
The NRL has backflipped on its stance that Parramatta can’t play for points until its `Gang of Five’ officials leave the club.
After NRL CEO Todd Greenberg initially said the Eels would not be allowed to accrue points while the five officials remained in their roles, the NRL’s counsel Lachlan Gyles told the NSW Supreme Court on Friday the group’s legal action against the league was a separate matter.
“It is a side show,” Gyles told the court.
“While this injunction is on foot, it would not prevent the accrual of points if it (Parramatta) is within the salary cap.”
Arthur Moses SC, the lawyer representing Eels chairman Steve Sharp, chief executive John Boulous, head of football Daniel Anderson, deputy chairman Tom Issa and director Peter Serrao, also confirmed he received paperwork from the NRL on Thursday stating their involvement with Parramatta was separate to the club’s need to get under the salary cap to begin playing for points again.
The Supreme Court’s injunction allowing the directors to continue their roles at the Eels was on Friday carried over until Monday.
But it seems the outcome of those proceedings will now not impact upon the Eels’ chances to win points beginning with next Friday’s round 10 match against South Sydney.
The Eels will still have to fit under the 2016 salary cap before that time.
The quintet were provisionally suspended as part of a raft of sanctions handed down on Tuesday by the NRL in regard to salary cap indiscretions at the Eels dating back to 2013.
Friday’s developments were in contrast to comments made by Greenberg on Fox Sports on Tuesday, only hours after handing down his provision sanctions, which included the loss of 12 competition points and a $1 million fine.
When asked on NRL 360 if Parramatta could accrue points if the deregistered employees remained with the club, Greenberg replied: “The short answer is no.
“The breach notice is very clear on the registration of officials and directors and they need to adhere to those provisions and that is also linked to them accruing points in the future.”
The directors were initially given a week to respond to the NRL’s move to deregister them.
That time frame has now been extended until June 3.
A final decision on the NRL’s move to dock the Eels points and fine them $1 million is expected to be made two weeks after that date.
That just shows more proof of Greenturds incompetence as head of the NRL. He says one thing one day and then says something completely different on another day. Nowhere in the original statements does it say anything about the Eels Officials being part of the prevention of the Eels accruing competition points. The Eels Officials were always a separate penalty. Getting the club 2016 Salary Cap complaint was always the only thing preventing the accrual of competition points.http://www.theroar.com.au/2016/05/06/nrl-backs-down-on-eels-directors-stance/
NRL backs down on Eels directors stance
By James MacSmith | 6 May 2016
Have your say19 Comments
The NRL has backflipped on its stance that Parramatta can’t play for points until its `Gang of Five’ officials leave the club.
After NRL CEO Todd Greenberg initially said the Eels would not be allowed to accrue points while the five officials remained in their roles, the NRL’s counsel Lachlan Gyles told the NSW Supreme Court on Friday the group’s legal action against the league was a separate matter.
“It is a side show,” Gyles told the court.
“While this injunction is on foot, it would not prevent the accrual of points if it (Parramatta) is within the salary cap.”
Arthur Moses SC, the lawyer representing Eels chairman Steve Sharp, chief executive John Boulous, head of football Daniel Anderson, deputy chairman Tom Issa and director Peter Serrao, also confirmed he received paperwork from the NRL on Thursday stating their involvement with Parramatta was separate to the club’s need to get under the salary cap to begin playing for points again.
The Supreme Court’s injunction allowing the directors to continue their roles at the Eels was on Friday carried over until Monday.
But it seems the outcome of those proceedings will now not impact upon the Eels’ chances to win points beginning with next Friday’s round 10 match against South Sydney.
The Eels will still have to fit under the 2016 salary cap before that time.
The quintet were provisionally suspended as part of a raft of sanctions handed down on Tuesday by the NRL in regard to salary cap indiscretions at the Eels dating back to 2013.
Friday’s developments were in contrast to comments made by Greenberg on Fox Sports on Tuesday, only hours after handing down his provision sanctions, which included the loss of 12 competition points and a $1 million fine.
When asked on NRL 360 if Parramatta could accrue points if the deregistered employees remained with the club, Greenberg replied: “The short answer is no.
“The breach notice is very clear on the registration of officials and directors and they need to adhere to those provisions and that is also linked to them accruing points in the future.”
The directors were initially given a week to respond to the NRL’s move to deregister them.
That time frame has now been extended until June 3.
A final decision on the NRL’s move to dock the Eels points and fine them $1 million is expected to be made two weeks after that date.
Greenturd was blindsided by the Injunction. The whole press conference was him trying to come across as being a caring but fair CEO to the Eels players.That just shows more proof of Greenturds incompetence as head of the NRL. He says one thing one day and then says something completely different on another day. Nowhere in the original statements does it say anything about the Eels Officials being part of the prevention of the Eels accruing competition points. The Eels Officials were always a separate penalty. Getting the club 2016 Salary Cap complaint was always the only thing preventing the accrual of competition points.
And meanwhile the Eels keep accruing points , currently sitting on 22 and 5th spot.
And guess what ??
Tomorrow is yet another Friday!!!
Greenturd does not want to traumatize the Eels Team before their friday game.And meanwhile the Eels keep accruing points , currently sitting on 22 and 5th spot.
And guess what ??
Tomorrow is yet another Friday!!!
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |