Loobs said:Apparently (well according the lurker at sportal), Luke Lewis is available. With Tetevano and Hoppa III off the books, is he worth a one year speccie for bench depth?
We do have a great record getting ex Penny vet back rowers...
Disco said:Speccie for bench depth???? Ahh no, he'd be an expensive starter
Cliffy said:Lewis, what to free up space for the sharks to offer more to DCE, Hmmmmmm, Nope.
mozgrame said:5 years ago, I would have jumped at the chance to sign him. 5 years is a long time in the NRL though.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 94 | 16 |
2 | Raiders | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 60 | 14 |
3 | Warriors | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
4 | Storm | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 76 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 54 | 10 |
6 | Sharks | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 49 | 10 |
7 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 10 |
8 | Tigers | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 10 |
9 | Cowboys | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -14 | 10 |
10 | Roosters | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -42 | 10 |
11 | Dolphins | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 8 |
12 | Dragons | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -14 | 8 |
13 | Knights | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -48 | 8 |
14 | Rabbitohs | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -70 | 8 |
15 | Panthers | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -2 | 6 |
16 | Titans | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -88 | 6 |
17 | Eels | 9 | 2 | 0 | 7 | -121 | 6 |