Loobs said:Apparently (well according the lurker at sportal), Luke Lewis is available. With Tetevano and Hoppa III off the books, is he worth a one year speccie for bench depth?
We do have a great record getting ex Penny vet back rowers...
Disco said:Speccie for bench depth???? Ahh no, he'd be an expensive starter
Cliffy said:Lewis, what to free up space for the sharks to offer more to DCE, Hmmmmmm, Nope.
mozgrame said:5 years ago, I would have jumped at the chance to sign him. 5 years is a long time in the NRL though.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 17 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 108 | 32 |
2 | Storm | 16 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 220 | 30 |
3 | Bulldogs | 16 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 96 | 30 |
4 | Warriors | 16 | 11 | 0 | 5 | 31 | 28 |
5 | Broncos | 17 | 10 | 0 | 7 | 80 | 24 |
6 | Panthers | 16 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 25 | 23 |
7 | Sea Eagles | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 58 | 22 |
8 | Roosters | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 21 | 22 |
9 | Sharks | 17 | 9 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 22 |
10 | Dolphins | 17 | 8 | 0 | 9 | 150 | 20 |
11 | Dragons | 16 | 6 | 0 | 10 | -56 | 18 |
12 | Cowboys | 17 | 6 | 1 | 10 | -144 | 17 |
13 | Knights | 17 | 6 | 0 | 11 | -85 | 16 |
14 | Tigers | 17 | 6 | 0 | 11 | -102 | 16 |
15 | Eels | 16 | 5 | 0 | 11 | -125 | 16 |
16 | Rabbitohs | 17 | 6 | 0 | 11 | -129 | 16 |
17 | Titans | 16 | 4 | 0 | 12 | -156 | 14 |