Klemmer

[TimmyQ]

It's frustrating to see Tom only back up his brother each week. The amount of offloads this team creates and the amount of times a forward holds the ball because there is no player in support is ridiculous. Whoever is in charge needs to be drilling this basic into the players. Hodko picked up the winning try from it last week

Ure spot on - and every game this year when we've actually looked like an entertaining skillful team is when we've wreaked havoc up the guts with blokes supporting the ball carier. But we only play that style every 4-5 games, so we only win like..every 4-5 games lol But thankfully some of our tactics are produced weekly.. like kicking into touch when we're attacking the opponents tryline... kill me now

 

[maxta]

Ure spot on - and every game this year when we've actually looked like an entertaining skillful team is when we've wreaked havoc up the guts with blokes supporting the ball carier. But we only play that style every 4-5 games, so we only win like..every 4-5 games lol But thankfully some of our tactics are produced weekly.. like kicking into touch when we're attacking the opponents tryline... kill me now

I realise that Parramatta slaughter they were diabolical in defence....but on the flipside it was the only game where players got around the ball carrier running into lanes either side.
Apart from that, these offloads which are good, go to a player flat footed who takes off from a standing start....or worse still, to the ground as the support is not prepared or anticipating the pass so run back and end up caught where the ball was thrown.
This leads to the call of bad or silly offload, where I am thinking dumb support play....

 

[bob dylan]

Hooper just said on 360 Klemmer wont be at the Dogs next year.

My guess : he is Roosters bound.

 

[HappilyManly]

Hooper just said on 360 Klemmer wont be at the Dogs next year.

My guess : he is Roosters bound.

Knights were keen on him too

 

[ricardo]

He would be a boon for any club but I doubt we would be in the mix to sign him. I almost expect him to be at the Riff next year, would be a good fit. Great player.

 

[mave]

Hooper just said on 360 Klemmer wont be at the Dogs next year.

My guess : he is Roosters bound.

Welllllllll, they are shopping Ryan Matterson around.
And they did lose Fergo.

 

[master blaster]

Maybe this is the signing Ryan was alluding to. We can only hope

 

[bob dylan]

He would be a boon for any club but I doubt we would be in the mix to sign him. I almost expect him to be at the Riff next year, would be a good fit. Great player.

 

[Heckenberg]

Maybe this is the signing Ryan was alluding to. We can only hope

Imagine our forward pack. It’d be scary

 

[Mark from Brisbane]

Imagine our forward pack. It’d be scary

It would be BUT would Toddles allow it to happen??

I’d say he’ll be Roosters bound, in fact everyone is Roosters bound as that’s where the big dollars are!!

 

[double hoops]

Has there been an off season when Klemmer hasn't some how been linked to a move to Man? If Penn can't sign a half decent coach. What hope has he got of getting Klemmer!

 

[bob dylan]

Used to love that Oxford educated Indian guy.

Ed Ames played Mingo

 

[StuBoot]

Surely he'll go to the Sharks with his best bud Woods, after all that's why Woods went to the Dogs wasn't it? Plus a truck load of cash.
The Sharks have plenty left in their cap, Toddles told us so.

 

[Harvies elbow]

He is great mates with the Tbros.
But I trust their negotiating skills not.
But hopes up Klem would be a great signing.

 

[globaleagle]

Ed Ames played Mingo

 

[Terry Zarsoff]

David Klem, David Klem,
What a doer, what a dream come a truer was David Klem.

 

[fLIP]

NRL would be the laughing stock of Australian sport if Klemmer ended up at the Roosters.

If its werent already the laughing stock of Australian sport.

 

[tookey]

Maybe why we are trying to offload Marty to sign Klemmer?

 

[bob dylan]

NRL would be the laughing stock of Australian sport if Klemmer ended up at the Roosters.

If its werent already the laughing stock of Australian sport.

Why?

We know they have enough money for both Marty and SBW.

So if the sign Klemmer that might end the constant Marty rumours. Then NRL will allow SBW to join after 30 June as has already been discussed many times.

Would be questionable only if they signed all 3 imo.

 

[Tragic Eagle]

I can't believe that it is even remotely possible that the NRL could allow the Roosters to fit him in. It is time for some transparency and sensible control by the NRL who are at present a bunch of bull ****ting spin doctors enslaved to the financial power brokers of the game. Each player must have a minimum contractual value to be taken into account into a side's salary cap that is determined by a valuing committee composing of members of the NRL Commission. There needs to be a formula that takes into account the years of service to a club and the players representative status. There needs to be set minimum and maximum contract values that should be published every year with a players value open for reassessment at the end of the term of an existing contract or at the time an existing contract is to be terminated and new contract entered. In addition if the contracted player receives third party agreements exceeding a cap set by the NRL then the players contract value for the salary cap should carry an added value over and above the default maximum amount so as to try and even the talent out. This current mob the do nothing other than try to talk this mess of a game at present and have no control and come up no new ideas what so ever. Idiots!.