We are all frustrated but as I say ( and not only you ) there’s a character assassination going on here , purely based on conjecture.
If and when there’s proof that he is the ringleader behind all these issues , then go for it , I wouldn’t blame you.
There also defamation laws to consider , if he or other team mates read this forum, anyone making comments such as this could be in deep do do!
Unlikely that anyone would go down that track BUT they could.
Conjecture? A little.
The club stated that there was a meeting of both sides (the players and the boycotters) before the rest of the team got together.
In attendance were Jake, DCE, and Aloiai. From that I can't help but think he was, at the very least, their nominated leader. I think he was more than that based on his age, his preacher studies, and the respect we see toward him from the other six on the field.
So yes, there is no proof but there is conjecture based on the possibility of who it might be and the probability that seven young men didn't decide to do this individually.
I don't believe it's defamatory to say I don't like him, just as I didn't like Les Boyd and John Hopoate in the team. The reasons I didn't like them should be pretty clear.
The reasons I don't like this bloke are because I sensed an arrogance in his departure from the Tigers, because (like the other six) he left our team without his services and with zero public explanation as to his reason for doing so, and I've seen his anti abortion posts on social media and I cannot abide anyone telling a woman what to do with her body.
And he's not a particularly great player.
So while he's here I will not cheer for him but I will always cheer for the team and I will be very pleased when he is no longer playing for us.
