Think that you are right with that assessment Woodsie , useful type player but even on a base salary only so many that can be included in the Manly top 30 and really past a development stage category . Also a priority to bring on young Schuster according to all indications . Maybe he would be prepared to just play with Black Town again but if he still has something to offer , maybe could find a top 30 spot with some other Sydney based club .We will struggle to fit in all the up and comers we currently have ... not aware of his reggie form last year ... but obviously didn't impress enough to get an NRL start ..... is he any better than GoJetSki, Waddell, Guacamole, etc ?
Gut feel is that if he was going to be a first grader ... he would have made it by now .....
Was thinking the same thing . can be elusive around the middle from what i have seen , as for his passing game , maybe he could adapt .Can he play hooker ?
Broncos seem to manage with Lodge.A no from me.
Even if he can play hooker why would you sign an ex-inmate to replace a bloke that may end up being an inmate himself?
Time for a no dickhead policy.
Yes, Jamil has done his time but still has that attached to him, these days sponsors want to be attached to clean skins.
A club that is seen as clean and has a no dickhead policy is a lot easier to attract sponsors too.
Nope....Apparently Jamil wants out of his broncos contract to return to Sydney. Should we throw a little coin at him
Stephen Hales please do what you reasonably can to add this touch of Manly to your Blacktown Worker Sea Eagle.
Pretty sure Brisbane have named him in their top 30....
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 70 | 10 |
3 | Broncos | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 56 | 8 |
4 | Raiders | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 36 | 8 |
5 | Dragons | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 8 |
6 | Warriors | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | -20 | 8 |
7 | Rabbitohs | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -36 | 8 |
8 | Cowboys | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | -42 | 8 |
9 | Tigers | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 28 | 6 |
10 | Dolphins | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 6 |
11 | Sharks | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 6 |
12 | Sea Eagles | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 6 |
13 | Titans | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -26 | 6 |
14 | Knights | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -40 | 6 |
15 | Roosters | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -52 | 4 |
16 | Panthers | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -38 | 2 |
17 | Eels | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -123 | 2 |