Souths getting belted, so its hard for a half to shine but Jamie is struggling big time.
Yet again, the $150k number has been pulled from thin air by the Daily Telecrap. Some of their journalists like Dean Ritchie were good enough not to disclose it, so another one went ahead and made it up.$150K for JH to go to Souths. Clearly didn't want to stay for money so he saw no chance in 1st grade with DCE and Brookes soaking up so much cap. Think of the sort of forwards you could've put around JH and Metcalf or Fainu. Like was said by many when DCE signed the 10 year deal and then the Trbojevics a couple yrs later. "We'll never win a premiership under this."
You would need good forwards around Humphries and Metcalf because they would challenge Ilias and Flanagan as the worst halves pairing in the comp.$150K for JH to go to Souths. Clearly didn't want to stay for money so he saw no chance in 1st grade with DCE and Brookes soaking up so much cap. Think of the sort of forwards you could've put around JH and Metcalf or Fainu. Like was said by many when DCE signed the 10 year deal and then the Trbojevics a couple yrs later. "We'll never win a premiership under this."
Brooks looked pretty ordinary at the wooden spoon Tigers as wellYou would need good forwards around Humphries and Metcalf because they would challenge Ilias and Flanagan as the worst halves pairing in the comp.
Humphreys is built like a forward, and doesn't have that turn of speed that is isential for a half back.Yet again, the $150k number has been pulled from thin air by the Daily Telecrap. Some of their journalists like Dean Ritchie were good enough not to disclose it, so another one went ahead and made it up.
We could only offer a min wage spot. Souths offered a much better deal from what I've heard, and the chance to play first grade.
Humphreys is not better than Brooks. Not at all.
also won the dally m half of the year there didnt he?Brooks looked pretty ordinary with the wooden spoon Tigers as well
Trust the wooden spoon Tigers half of the year is not an opinion . It is a factalso won the dally m half of the year there didnt he?
tbh i'll trust that over your opinion.
If he was not just a year wonder his price would not drop from 1 mil to 600kalso won the dally m half of the year there didnt he?
Chess and Checkers has been repeated many times HypocriteIf posters repeat the same thing, over and over, and over, and over again, along with a few helpful memes added for good measure, any narrative can take on a life of its own.
I'd suggest sticking to Checkers, and give the Chess a wide berth.
Glad you aren't in law - do they accept memes and riddles in a courtroom by the way?Trust the wooden spoon Tigers half of the year is not an opinion . It is a fact
What has inlaws and court rooms got to do about footy matters ?Glad you aren't in law - do they accept memes and riddles in a courtroom by the way?
If you know you know......What has inlaws and court rooms got to do about footy matters ?
like i said i will trust the dally m "judges" over you on any footy matterWhat has inlaws and court rooms got to do about footy matters ?
like i said i will trust the dally m "judges" over you on any footy matter
@BOZO I mean this in a kind way but RUOK? You've been noticeably a bit more reactive and angry lately. In the past your reaction to comments like that you'd just swat away like flies and not react. Have you not been getting you leg over enough? Hope all is well feathered friend.Chess and Checkers has been repeated many times Hypocrite
Now we are talking footy which is what we are supposed to here .....like i said i will trust the dally m "judges" over you on any footy matter
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
2 | 2 | 0 | 44 | 6 |
![]() |
3 | 2 | 1 | 36 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 2 | 0 | 32 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 2 | 0 | 24 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 4 |
![]() |
3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 2 |
![]() |
3 | 1 | 2 | -6 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 0 | 2 | -9 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -16 | 2 |
![]() |
3 | 1 | 2 | -38 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 0 | 2 | -16 | 0 |
![]() |
2 | 0 | 2 | -64 | 0 |
![]() |
3 | 0 | 3 | -64 | 0 |