Jamie Humphreys

$150K for JH to go to Souths. Clearly didn't want to stay for money so he saw no chance in 1st grade with DCE and Brookes soaking up so much cap. Think of the sort of forwards you could've put around JH and Metcalf or Fainu. Like was said by many when DCE signed the 10 year deal and then the Trbojevics a couple yrs later. "We'll never win a premiership under this."
Yet again, the $150k number has been pulled from thin air by the Daily Telecrap. Some of their journalists like Dean Ritchie were good enough not to disclose it, so another one went ahead and made it up.

We could only offer a min wage spot. Souths offered a much better deal from what I've heard, and the chance to play first grade.

Humphreys is not better than Brooks. Not at all.
 
$150K for JH to go to Souths. Clearly didn't want to stay for money so he saw no chance in 1st grade with DCE and Brookes soaking up so much cap. Think of the sort of forwards you could've put around JH and Metcalf or Fainu. Like was said by many when DCE signed the 10 year deal and then the Trbojevics a couple yrs later. "We'll never win a premiership under this."
You would need good forwards around Humphries and Metcalf because they would challenge Ilias and Flanagan as the worst halves pairing in the comp.
 
The clamour for the hot young rookie is always a thing because they offer possibilities. They often don't reach what is hoped for them but for a short while they offer that hope.

Humphrey's looks better than I thought but still not convinced he is a first grader of consequence.

Amazing the shade Brooks gets. 23 trys assits and 22 line break assists last year.

That is 1st and 2nd in the NRL for 5/8s.

Brooks has be very good on a pretty reasonable deal.
 
Last edited:
Yet again, the $150k number has been pulled from thin air by the Daily Telecrap. Some of their journalists like Dean Ritchie were good enough not to disclose it, so another one went ahead and made it up.

We could only offer a min wage spot. Souths offered a much better deal from what I've heard, and the chance to play first grade.

Humphreys is not better than Brooks. Not at all.
Humphreys is built like a forward, and doesn't have that turn of speed that is isential for a half back.
 
If posters repeat the same thing, over and over, and over, and over again, along with a few helpful memes added for good measure, any narrative can take on a life of its own.

I'd suggest sticking to Checkers, and give the Chess a wide berth.
Chess and Checkers has been repeated many times Hypocrite
 
Chess and Checkers has been repeated many times Hypocrite
@BOZO I mean this in a kind way but RUOK? You've been noticeably a bit more reactive and angry lately. In the past your reaction to comments like that you'd just swat away like flies and not react. Have you not been getting you leg over enough? Hope all is well feathered friend.
 
like i said i will trust the dally m "judges" over you on any footy matter
Now we are talking footy which is what we are supposed to here .....
Like I said ....
If the Dally Half was not just a year wonder his price would not drop from 1 mil to 600k
The Dally M wonder was also a Wooden spoon half
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
2 2 0 44 6
3 2 1 36 4
2 2 0 32 4
2 2 0 24 4
2 2 0 16 4
3 2 1 6 4
2 2 0 3 4
2 1 1 24 2
2 1 1 18 2
2 1 1 10 2
3 1 2 -6 2
2 0 2 -9 2
1 0 1 -16 2
3 1 2 -38 2
2 0 2 -16 0
2 0 2 -64 0
3 0 3 -64 0
Back
Top Bottom