Jamal Fogarty

Hope he can maintain his current form because I’m actually quite excited about this signing. I really hated the idea of moving guys out of position and having Brooks lead the halves, it felt like we’d be wasting what is a pretty talented roster. Fogarty can hopefully just do his job and I really think we’ll be fine, maybe even better than with DCE (especially now that his effort has gone out the window). Fogarty kicks well and just does what he needs, DCE often tries a big play where he’ll kick through on like 2nd tackle and it doesn’t work. I like having someone who will just kick well and play a bit of a methodical style, assuming Seibold and co don’t try and push something else onto him. In the meantime, we need to hold on to our youngsters and really look at bringing in a new forward for next year.
 
Think he has been very good today(not goalkicking).
Defence has been good,can't help Timoko making poor decisions,moves all around the field,organised them well, doesn't overplay his hand and uses his forwards and runners well.
Seems very calm and a leader.

And here I am thinking his defence has been poor today, not of first grade standard.

Dont worry I was thinking the same a few weeks back about Brooks after he missed 8 or 9 tackles.
 
And here I am thinking his defence has been poor today, not of first grade standard.

Dont worry I was thinking the same a few weeks back about Brooks after he missed 8 or 9 tackles.
It is all opinion,for me I thought he was strong,read what was happening,brought down the forwards who came his way,stuck to his man in front of him,not getting fooled by the offence
The only poor part I saw was Timoko having no idea at centre who to take,coming in unnecessarily etc
Interesting to know what part or parts were poor from him ....
 
Last edited:
You seem to wanna get rid of the whole team mate? Everything ok? I have a suggestion….support another team so we don’t have to put up with your whining!

What are you talking about? Never lets the facts or logic get in the way of your flawed thinking.

Do you want Manly to be paying good money for Brooks, Fogarty and get rid of Joey Walsh?

Can't keep all 3 after Brooks deal expires next year if Walsh steps up.

Is it that hard for you to follow? 🤔
 
What are you talking about? Never lets the facts or logic get in the way of your flawed thinking.

Do you want Manly to be paying good money for Brooks, Fogarty and get rid of Joey Walsh?

Can't keep all 3 after Brooks deal expires next year if Walsh steps up.

Is it that hard for you to follow? 🤔
Both Brooks and Walsh are signed until the end of 2027. You're stirring up a drama that literally cannot occur. He can't leave the club unless we let him go. It's not like the Humphreys situation, where his contract lapsed. This is impossible.
 
Both Brooks and Walsh are signed until the end of 2027. You're stirring up a drama that literally cannot occur. He can't leave the club unless we let him go. It's not like the Humphreys situation, where his contract lapsed. This is impossible.

My mistake. I guess I shouldn't read what is posted here, on this very page.

Regardless, if Walsh steps up next year, we will have 3 half's for 2 positions, regardless of how long they are signed for.
We have all seen, contracts can be flexible if necessary.
 
Is Brooks till the end of 27?

I thought he signed a 3 year deal?
My mistake. I guess I shouldn't read what is posted here, on this very page.

Regardless, if Walsh steps up next year, we will have 3 half's for 2 positions, regardless of how long they are signed for.
We have all seen, contracts can be flexible if necessary.
I could see him getting a solid contract in the super league for a couple of years if we wanted to shift him in 2027. Personally feel he is going to definitely be surplus to our needs by then.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Staff online

    • Jethro
      Star Trekkin' across the universe

    Members online

    Latest posts

    2020 Ladder

    Team P W D L PD Pts
    1 Bulldogs 10 9 0 1 110 20
    2 Warriors 10 8 0 2 5 18
    3 Storm 9 6 0 3 140 14
    4 Raiders 10 7 0 3 48 14
    5 Sharks 10 6 0 4 65 12
    6 Sea Eagles 10 5 0 5 38 12
    7 Cowboys 10 4 1 5 -32 11
    8 Broncos 10 5 0 5 46 10
    9 Tigers 10 5 0 5 -44 10
    10 Roosters 10 4 0 6 -46 10
    11 Rabbitohs 10 5 0 5 -62 10
    12 Panthers 10 3 1 6 -2 9
    13 Dolphins 11 4 0 7 6 8
    14 Dragons 9 3 0 6 -15 8
    15 Knights 10 3 0 7 -74 8
    16 Titans 9 3 0 6 -84 8
    17 Eels 10 3 0 7 -99 8
    Back
    Top Bottom