and yet ... after every thread saying our defence has to improve ... some (wow, I nearly said numbnuts) want to rid the team of our best defender ...
Hit the nail on the head. Numbnuts there i said it.
and yet ... after every thread saying our defence has to improve ... some (wow, I nearly said numbnuts) want to rid the team of our best defender ...
and yet ... after every thread saying our defence has to improve ... some (wow, I nearly said numbnuts) want to rid the team of our best defender ...
He's a 40 minute middle who should be on about 500 - 600k not the rediculous 900k+. If we play him at #13 with Aloha , Pillow and Sips/Taki as our middles then it'll be more of the same plodding forward pack of the last few years. Add in Brown who looked like he was running in mud last night. Has anyone seen that photo of Junior Paulo at Parra he's deadset gone from butterbean physique to SBW.
How about Waddell on a 3 year deal. Brown on a multi year deal. Lodge on any deal after refusing our contract and being caught red faced etc. acquiring Tevaga and losing Lawton (when Humphreys could have that spot). Aloiai an extension.Not happy that we are paying Jake so much, however I am more pi**ed that we resigned oshay on way more than he is worth and for way too long
Shouldn't be surprised mate. The crazy deals and absurd contracts have been going on for a decade since the back flip fiasco.How about Waddell on a 3 year deal. Brown on a multi year deal. Lodge on any deal after refusing our contract and being caught red faced etc. acquiring Tevaga and losing Lawton (when Humphreys could have that spot). Aloiai an extension.
It's all very .....confusing.
Plus we are still paying for Schuster ....
I still think he’s a Prop HOWEVER who replaces him at 13, and therein lays the problem.
Which means for the foreseeable future he’ll wear the 13 jersey.
Second row???Jake is our best defender and he should be prop or second row IMO he should not be playing 13.
Jake is our best defender and he should be prop or second row IMO he should not be playing 13.
Waddells sister marrying Jake all but shored up Coreys future at Manly. 😉How about Waddell on a 3 year deal. Brown on a multi year deal. Lodge on any deal after refusing our contract and being caught red faced etc. acquiring Tevaga and losing Lawton (when Humphreys could have that spot). Aloiai an extension.
It's all very .....confusing.
Plus we are still paying for Schuster ....
The problem with Jake as a prop is that he makes SFA metres or post contact metres. We have matchstick thin outside backs who make more post contact metres. Maybe 2 or 3 times a season he pulls out a 150+ metres running game, but they're becoming as rare as his offloads.
His biggest strength was always his defence, but the 6 again rule has largely sped up the game and nullified that. How often do we hear "Jake get off" from the refs because he takes (in their opinion) too long to get off a tackled player?? Its like its become part of the commentary for Manly games.
I like Jake, we all do. Its hard not to like the bloke. But the reality is that we're paying an awful lot of money out of the salary cap for someone who's game literally plateaued 5 years ago.
I would like to see this part of his game get binned, he was a good runner of the ball until they went with this tactic.Agree his metres arent great however his job is to land on his knees and get a quick play the ball. His play the ball is one of the quickest in the NRL. Its almost a voluntary tackle.
Agree his metres arent great however his job is to land on his knees and get a quick play the ball. His play the ball is one of the quickest in the NRL. Its almost a voluntary tackle.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |