Is this the week we see some changes?

Should we pick Seggy this week?

  • Yes - starting drop Croker

  • Yes - Croker starting Seggy bench

  • No - keep the status quo


Results are only viewable after voting.
DES wont be making wholesale changes.

Bull up front can only help speed things up and tire teams out.

Davey and Guac backrow.

But if back row is where we are short till Shoe comes back and now Burbo might be out.

Id run Keppie out wider if short. YES YES I know his cover defence has been horrible and that's part of the reason id move him there.

Teams really targeting the ball with him running straight on in middle. Until that's fixed being a bit wider and more side on and legs defending will help as well. Its not like we haven't played him in the backrow before.
 
Last edited:
If so, instead of recalling Harper, would it be a more positive move to select Walker at centre
I would go for that and the reasoning is that Walker hasn’t been as effective in recent weeks coming off the bench , Then Manly‘s bench could accommodate another hooker to give that extra spark around the ruck
 
Might see humphreys and schuster and weekes. Dce hurt, foz moving into Pacific Lodge at DY, Tom marginal.
 
I didnt catch it.. geez sounds like he had a bad run. He was great in the trial and in the games i saw last season.

Hes only just come back.. may need a few more matches then!
He wasn’t on his Pat Malone for ordinary games for Blacktown.He’s only 21 so he’s got time,especially for a front rower,who really don’t hit their straps til around 25-26,Payne Haas aside.It’s why I’m not so critical on the likes of Keppie,Paseka and Bullemor,all still 24 or younger.
 
When players feel unnoticed they loose interest. hard to lift your performance in a team getting flogged each week. He looked real good in the trial against the Tigers and has real potential. Most our pack are playing very poorly at the moment anyway.
 
If you drop Crocker we need someone to do his 50 plus tackles a match.

I'd suggest this would be a very poor move as Jake is the only other defender we have that is prepared to have a dig each week. I guess we could drop him also and see if we can concede a 100 per match vs Storm and Riff.
 
Last edited:
We need the props, bench players and Haumole to step it up in defence and be there for those 1 percenters that is required.

Jake and Croker can't be the one's that do the majority of the D in a team sport.
 
If you drop Crocker we need someone to do his 50 plus tackles a match.

I'd suggest this would be a very poor move as Jake is the only other defender we have that is prepared to have a dig each week. I guess we could drop him also and see if we can concede a 100 per match vs Storm and Riff.
I don’t believe they’d drop Croker but maybe he plays minute 1 to 30, then minute 50 to 80.

With half time he’d get a 30 minute break.

Might in fact make him more effective.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
24 19 5 148 44
24 17 7 212 40
24 16 8 120 38
24 15 9 172 36
24 15 9 109 36
24 14 10 21 34
24 13 10 107 33
24 13 11 132 32
24 12 12 125 30
24 12 12 21 30
24 10 14 -76 26
24 9 14 -146 25
24 9 15 -135 24
24 9 15 -181 24
24 8 16 -130 22
24 6 18 -199 18
24 6 18 -300 18
Back
Top Bottom