Interchanges - WHY?

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by Rexx, May 1, 2006.



Share This Page

  1. Rexx

    By:RexxMay 1, 2006
    Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2006
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    Des made some half-time interchanges yesterday. Not the first time. I just don't get it WHY????

    Given there's a ten minute halftime break, whoever was on the field before half-time should be left on the field after half-time. They can give their all for say 10 minutes and then be replaced by a fresh player. This, to me, was a waste of interchanges. That's OK if you've got a suplus of interchanges. But our players were almost dead on their feet by the end of the game - so we didn't.

    Just as well it didn't go to extra time.
     
  2. Stillman

    By:StillmanMay 1, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005
    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    3
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8 /0
    Des still had plenty of interchanges in his hand. King and Kite made an impact when they came back on at half time. Having Williamson on the bench for 70 minutes is the real worry.
     
  3. Rexx

    By:RexxMay 1, 2006
    Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2006
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    If that's the case, then that implies Des doesn't have faith in his bench. They needed fresh legs yesterday. If the faith isn't there, then some more salary cap money may need to go to bench recruitment.

     
  4. The Wheel

    By:The WheelMay 1, 2006
    Well-Known Member
    2018 Tipping Competitor

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    12,014
    Likes Received:
    1,422
    Likes Given:
    783
    Ratings:
    +4,435 /142
    Watching the replay on fox last night I think Manly had only used 5 interchanges to Parra 10 with about 20 mins to go. As Stillman suggested he may have done it because he had so many up his sleeve. But in normal course I would have though it would have been better to nake them after about 10 mins in the 2nd half
     
  5. Rexx

    By:RexxMay 1, 2006
    Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2006
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    And King and Kite would have made an impact 10 minutes later, Stillman. The players on the field did get them back into the game after all, taking the score from 16-0 to 16-12 in the leadup to half-time.

     
  6. The Gronk

    By:The GronkMay 1, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,473
    Likes Received:
    37
    Likes Given:
    22
    Ratings:
    +37 /0
    On the TV coverage they said BK had a lot to say at half time about firing up for the start of the second half. That's why they put their best side back on the paddock-so they could make the best start.
     
  7. ads

    By:adsMay 1, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2005
    Messages:
    1,633
    Likes Received:
    26
    Likes Given:
    157
    Ratings:
    +29 /1
    I think it was sensible. Because it meant that both King and Kite got two spells each in the second half. More than just one in the middle of the second half.
     
  8. Canteen Worker

    By:Canteen WorkerMay 1, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    13,244
    Likes Received:
    187
    Likes Given:
    100
    Ratings:
    +215 /5
    If the radio reports from yesterday are correct Monaghan broke his hand. That would explain why he did not get much game time.

    I thought Willo added defensive impact when he came on which was a good thing.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
Top