sheesh, they're just forwards!!!
Find a big guy, throw him the ball and tell him to run straight! I mean how hard can it be?
Find a big guy, throw him the ball and tell him to run straight! I mean how hard can it be?
You are right globaleagle .We have at least 9 big mother f##### rsglobaleagle said:sheesh, they're just forwards!!!
Find a big guy, throw him the ball and tell him to run straight! I mean how hard can it be?
Chip and Chase said:Because only 3 of those props have regular NRL experience and are proven at that level. One of those has had a horror run with injuries, and one other is carrying a significant neck injury into the season. I'm a little bit worried.
jbb/james said:One of the biggest skills in recruitment and retention isnt always about who you buy, but when you allow some to move on. The props lost are all Manly to the bone, are favorite club men that add value on and off the field. Its a hard call but its better to do 1 year early than 1 year late
Kite is the biggest loss but at his age getting him on a 1 year deal would not have been in his interests and a 2 year deal was not in ours.
Hopefully the new guys do well, but it is more about the others moving on to be honest. Who will fill the void, someone will. geez have you seen the storms props. You wouldnt have any of them in your team and they go alright
Can't remember his name, he was a Blondie haired kid, ( Not Lussick ) it was during the Trials for S G Ball up at Newcastle around 4 years ago. What I saw of him, he had talent.SeaEagleRock8 said:Which halfback?
Eagle Rock said:jbb/james said:One of the biggest skills in recruitment and retention isnt always about who you buy, but when you allow some to move on. The props lost are all Manly to the bone, are favorite club men that add value on and off the field. Its a hard call but its better to do 1 year early than 1 year late
Kite is the biggest loss but at his age getting him on a 1 year deal would not have been in his interests and a 2 year deal was not in ours.
Hopefully the new guys do well, but it is more about the others moving on to be honest. Who will fill the void, someone will. geez have you seen the storms props. You wouldnt have any of them in your team and they go alright
You are Correct and It also comes down to $$$$ for Manly buying Decent Props. Manly are Struggling Financially, they buy players on the Cheap that are struggling to find clubs, because of this, It is Important they should take the 9s Competition in Auckland Seriously, they need to put the Best Side forward to Win. With a Share of 2 Million Dollars, it would be a Big Plus for the club. I remember a few years back there was a talented Halfback playing S G Ball and The Melbourne Storm pounced onto him. They set him up nicely down there and looked after him
Yes but as far as Manly being Financially Secure for the Future and when some of these players have retired, Manly will be a lot better position and the Recruitment will be more Attractive here. Plus Our Juniors will be looked after better.Ralphie said:Eagle Rock said:jbb/james said:One of the biggest skills in recruitment and retention isnt always about who you buy, but when you allow some to move on. The props lost are all Manly to the bone, are favorite club men that add value on and off the field. Its a hard call but its better to do 1 year early than 1 year late
Kite is the biggest loss but at his age getting him on a 1 year deal would not have been in his interests and a 2 year deal was not in ours.
Hopefully the new guys do well, but it is more about the others moving on to be honest. Who will fill the void, someone will. geez have you seen the storms props. You wouldnt have any of them in your team and they go alright
You are Correct and It also comes down to $$$$ for Manly buying Decent Props. Manly are Struggling Financially, they buy players on the Cheap that are struggling to find clubs, because of this, It is Important they should take the 9s Competition in Auckland Seriously, they need to put the Best Side forward to Win. With a Share of 2 Million Dollars, it would be a Big Plus for the club. I remember a few years back there was a talented Halfback playing S G Ball and The Melbourne Storm pounced onto him. They set him up nicely down there and looked after him
Manly could have an extra $10 million in the bank and they would still be buying cheap props, the Salary Cap sees to that.
Eagle Rock said:Can't remember his name, he was a Blondie haired kid, ( Not Lussick ) it was during the Trials for S G Ball up at Newcastle around 4 years ago. What I saw of him, he had talent.
HappilyManly said:Eagle Rock said:Can't remember his name, he was a Blondie haired kid, ( Not Lussick ) it was during the Trials for S G Ball up at Newcastle around 4 years ago. What I saw of him, he had talent.
Was it Fabian Natoli ? - He went to Union last year - Manly Marlins
He was a good little Player, but 2v's height and effort on field, had crazy blond curly hair 🙂
http://www.ourfootyteam.com.au/juniorReps_lockerRoom_seaEagles.php
Chip and Chase said:Matt Orford ?? He'll be back.
Bradza said:"Manly are Struggling Financially"
"No wasn't Fabs. Now there is a halfback lost to Manly Rugby. He is the Best halfback going around and I watch a lot of footy."
Che!?
Welcome aboard Eagle Rock but fair go with the outlandish statements. You sound like you have some connection with the junior rep teams and I'll take that into account when reading your posts.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 70 | 10 |
3 | Raiders | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 46 | 10 |
4 | Warriors | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | -18 | 10 |
5 | Broncos | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 54 | 8 |
6 | Sharks | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 41 | 8 |
7 | Dragons | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 8 |
8 | Rabbitohs | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -36 | 8 |
9 | Cowboys | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | -42 | 8 |
10 | Dolphins | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 6 |
11 | Sea Eagles | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 6 |
12 | Tigers | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 6 |
13 | Titans | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -36 | 6 |
14 | Knights | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -60 | 6 |
15 | Panthers | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -10 | 4 |
16 | Roosters | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -80 | 4 |
17 | Eels | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -107 | 4 |