How’s Parker going on an edge for blacktown?I always thought DCE leg wheel was a bigger issue than Guac. Just be thank ful it's not considered a trip more weeks. Take the two. Build some resilience.
Jake T will steer them round the paddock. Jake Arthur is as good as anyone in the raiders halves.
Bullemor was great in the middle and got stuff all minutes. He's the logical edge replacement. But he's better in the middle. I'd like something different tried on the edge.
I wonder if Browny could play on an edge? Brown was great in middle too. Bull needs more minutes.
Meh **** it - Roll the dice & tell the NRL - WE DONT BEND OVER FOR YOU.If they fight the charge and lose, then they will also miss the 'Magic Round' match against the Broncos.
You’re not going to make Lawton play back row from the start,then move him into dummy half,too much reshuffling and rejigging combinations.Lawton plays back row the whole game(or as long as his fitness allows) and you bring in GCKT or Humphries to 14 or Lawton stays at 14 and someone else plays back row.Lawton loses spark out of dummy half if he starts off playing in the back row.Minimal changes is the way to goLawton‘s the obvious choice, he’ll get 80 and works defensively.
Jakes Arthur for Chez, probably Brooks to 7, JA plays 6.
Bench, 15 Bully, 16 Lodge, 17 Brown, not sure about our 14, maybe a 20 min shot for GCT or JH, but I don’t like it against Canberra. Play Parker @ 14, Lawton can spell Froggy, he gets 80 playing 60 on the edge and 20 at DH, Parks comes on and plays 20 on the edge, when Lawton spells Froggy, Parks gives us cover on the pine for a backline reshuffle if we need it.
He's progressing well with playing a new role. Really looks a leader in ressies too. In terms of taking Guac starting spot after 7 or so games? We have better options.How’s Parker going on an edge for blacktown?
We haven’t lost yetAnd makes both games now 50/50 at best
We will struggle badly without both ola and DCE
This will come back to bite us later on in the season these 4 points
Are you from Bowen, Mango?If our legal team cant handle this!..
we’ve got issues.
Simply the NRL has already accepted that that the bunker is incompetent by dragging DCE in..
the bunker is there to see all that the ref cant, with the time clock at their disposal
Incompetence 101, and they've admitted to this in this instance
Rip them to shreds.. accept No fault
Being accidental is no excuse for them getting off, it was careless and sloppy, if it was deliberate, they would have been hit with a reckless charge and then it would have been 4-6 weeks, DCE may have cause to have it downgraded perhaps, but I doubt that he would succeed, cop the 2 weeks and move on.Surely the club challenges this. Absolutely no way this is right, was accidental from both of them.
Yeah is it possible one of them could take the total blame and be like it was totally my fault which somewhat excuses the other ?Call me crazy but I think we should challenge on the basis of both players blaming each other.... then maybe only one of them is suspended (we can survive without ola for 2-3 weeks imo)
Spot on, the Manly loading strikes again. Would it have applied to Penrith, Broncs, or even Souths players? I think not 😡NRL giving us the Manly loading as usual and trying to derail our season, as we beat one of their pet teams.
Damo it's the other way around mateee, DCE can't lift a 200cm 6f 8inc 120kg front rower he was just going with the tackle then he pulled out at the end.Watching the replay I think Haumole could get his charge downgraded since he was holding Lane around the chest while DCE lifted the legs. I reckon the legal team should try to downgrade at least Haumole's involvement in the tackle.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |