Chip and Chase said:mozgrame said:c eagle said:Moz, I see your point..... But I know it's been some time since we have seen it , but king used to never take a back ward step.... And really take it to the opposition.... Just a player that plays with a little fire in the belly, just seems like the forwards turn up and get there metres and tackles, which is getting the job done on most occasions like you mentioned...... Just would like to see a top dog willing to stand up and serve it up to opposition packs
I agree completely with your Kingy assessment, but you could also just have easily described Mason, except Mason is still playing well at his age. It may sound funny, but I think that under the guidance/influence of Mason, JSL may turn very quickly into the front rower you are looking for.
Jesse needs about 10-15kg of muscle and some more mongrel if he is any hope of becoming a front rower.
Every mongrel makes an impact and Hasson does not make an impact . That's what we mean by the term mongrel .Snake said:Chip and Chase said:mozgrame said:c eagle said:Moz, I see your point..... But I know it's been some time since we have seen it , but king used to never take a back ward step.... And really take it to the opposition.... Just a player that plays with a little fire in the belly, just seems like the forwards turn up and get there metres and tackles, which is getting the job done on most occasions like you mentioned...... Just would like to see a top dog willing to stand up and serve it up to opposition packs
I agree completely with your Kingy assessment, but you could also just have easily described Mason, except Mason is still playing well at his age. It may sound funny, but I think that under the guidance/influence of Mason, JSL may turn very quickly into the front rower you are looking for.
Jesse needs about 10-15kg of muscle and some more mongrel if he is any hope of becoming a front rower.
I don't think he lacks mongrel; he has a red hot go. But I don't think he is a front rower and I also don't think the club see him as a front rower. He will stay in the back row where he belongs.
Fluffy said:I am just wondering which of our halves we let go so we can have enough top line forwards to cover 5 injuries/suspensions whilst still having the best pack in the league?
Or are we in the deluded world of no salary cap?
Take out the burgess boys, teo and luke and the bunnies would have gone out in straight sets.
mozgrame said:I wonder if it would have been better to leave Hasson in the back row instead of trying to turn him into a front rower??
http://wn.com/james_hasson
Chee Kam looked good playing in the NYC with as wellmozgrame said:I wonder if it would have been better to leave Hasson in the back row instead of trying to turn him into a front rower??
http://wn.com/james_hasson
BOZO said:Chee Kam looked good playing in the NYC with as wellmozgrame said:I wonder if it would have been better to leave Hasson in the back row instead of trying to turn him into a front rower??
http://wn.com/james_hasson
The NRL sorts out the men from the boys
Classic lol 🙂mozgrame said:BOZO said:Chee Kam looked good playing in the NYC with as wellmozgrame said:I wonder if it would have been better to leave Hasson in the back row instead of trying to turn him into a front rower??
http://wn.com/james_hasson
The NRL sorts out the men from the boys
Something the Catholic Church should have done years ago.
Chee-Kam to prop!!
Apologies to MCK, and any Catholics in the audience. I'm a bit pissed. LOL!! 😀
Moops said:Fluffy said:I am just wondering which of our halves we let go so we can have enough top line forwards to cover 5 injuries/suspensions whilst still having the best pack in the league?
Or are we in the deluded world of no salary cap?
Take out the burgess boys, teo and luke and the bunnies would have gone out in straight sets.
I don't think our injured forwards were of the calibre of the Burgess boys, Teo and Luke, but just my personal opinion though LOL. Naive, or silly, comparison me thinks.
BOZO said:Every mongrel makes an impact and Hasson does not make an impact . That's what we mean by the term mongrel .Snake said:Chip and Chase said:mozgrame said:c eagle said:Moz, I see your point..... But I know it's been some time since we have seen it , but king used to never take a back ward step.... And really take it to the opposition.... Just a player that plays with a little fire in the belly, just seems like the forwards turn up and get there metres and tackles, which is getting the job done on most occasions like you mentioned...... Just would like to see a top dog willing to stand up and serve it up to opposition packs
I agree completely with your Kingy assessment, but you could also just have easily described Mason, except Mason is still playing well at his age. It may sound funny, but I think that under the guidance/influence of Mason, JSL may turn very quickly into the front rower you are looking for.
Jesse needs about 10-15kg of muscle and some more mongrel if he is any hope of becoming a front rower.
I don't think he lacks mongrel; he has a red hot go. But I don't think he is a front rower and I also don't think the club see him as a front rower. He will stay in the back row where he belongs.
I don't believe you have to be a dirty player to have mongrel IMO . 2V was tough he made an impact and he had mongrel but was never a dirty player He had no sht in his game at allSnake said:BOZO said:Every mongrel makes an impact and Hasson does not make an impact . That's what we mean by the term mongrel .Snake said:Chip and Chase said:mozgrame said:I agree completely with your Kingy assessment, but you could also just have easily described Mason, except Mason is still playing well at his age. It may sound funny, but I think that under the guidance/influence of Mason, JSL may turn very quickly into the front rower you are looking for.
Jesse needs about 10-15kg of muscle and some more mongrel if he is any hope of becoming a front rower.
I don't think he lacks mongrel; he has a red hot go. But I don't think he is a front rower and I also don't think the club see him as a front rower. He will stay in the back row where he belongs.
I was talking about JSL, as was Chip. To my knowledge, in Rugby League terms, mongrel refers to a player that exudes aggression in their playing style. Kite made a great impact but you wouldn't necessarily say he had mongrel...he was tough and worked hard. JWH is a mongrel because he is always pushing and shoving, first man to start a niggle, and appears angry all the time.
BOZO said:I don't believe you have to be a dirty player to have mongrel IMO . 2V was tough he made an impact and he had mongrel but was never a dirty player He had no sht in his game at allSnake said:BOZO said:Every mongrel makes an impact and Hasson does not make an impact . That's what we mean by the term mongrel .Snake said:Chip and Chase said:Jesse needs about 10-15kg of muscle and some more mongrel if he is any hope of becoming a front rower.
I don't think he lacks mongrel; he has a red hot go. But I don't think he is a front rower and I also don't think the club see him as a front rower. He will stay in the back row where he belongs.
I was talking about JSL, as was Chip. To my knowledge, in Rugby League terms, mongrel refers to a player that exudes aggression in their playing style. Kite made a great impact but you wouldn't necessarily say he had mongrel...he was tough and worked hard. JWH is a mongrel because he is always pushing and shoving, first man to start a niggle, and appears angry all the time.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 94 | 16 |
2 | Raiders | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 60 | 14 |
3 | Warriors | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
4 | Storm | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 76 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 54 | 10 |
6 | Sharks | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 49 | 10 |
7 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 10 |
8 | Tigers | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 10 |
9 | Cowboys | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -14 | 10 |
10 | Roosters | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -42 | 10 |
11 | Dolphins | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 8 |
12 | Dragons | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -14 | 8 |
13 | Knights | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -48 | 8 |
14 | Rabbitohs | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -70 | 8 |
15 | Panthers | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -2 | 6 |
16 | Titans | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -88 | 6 |
17 | Eels | 9 | 2 | 0 | 7 | -121 | 6 |