SeaEagleRock8 said:
He hasn't denied telling Schell it's nothing to do with us, go talk to Sam Ayoub.
I suppose different CEOs may have had a different attitude when presented with info that his player had a major gambling issue and owed one bloke 30,000.
Some CEOs might have at least gone to speak with the player?
Anyway I'm not surprised he was cleared on the narrow issue of whether he knew about the actual NRL bets.
However this result hardly gives the lie to Greenberg's growing reputation as a man concerned with far more important things than the welfare of his players and their families.
Agree...And the court of public opinion, even common sense and ethical operation, is often more accurate than the letter of the law. In this case, basically hearsay is almost worthless.
That bigger picture of Greenturd is not pretty, to say the least. The odd person might be pleased right now...like Bulldogs supporters or apologists...lol.
For those seriously interested in the integrity of footy, I doubt the next instalment of Greenterd's ''greatest hits'' (so to speak) will be far away.