Garrick

What aggro are you talking about??

But here is something for you.....if Koula played for any of the current top 8 sides, he wouldn't be a centre and wouldn't be a fullback.

That some class him as our best centre tells the problems we have.
Give it up mate! You don’t think much of him, I do…..as do many commentators & ex players who I dare say know a hell of a lot more about talent than you do. Any club in the top 8 would have him in an instant.
Anyway agree to disagree!
 
Let him go he is a good winger but that's it. The last thing we need to do is over pay him.
Think the issue here is about value. His worth or cost. yes, been great player for the club, goal kicker. That try he scored from our in-goal area after getting a spray from DCE a year ago or so - brilliant. The chase the other day - showed great heart. BUT, his contract was about his ability to grow tries from 4 to 6 points. Doesn't our new half back become a suitable replacement option? This affects his $ value.

Football is a business, it has a time limit, don't blame one little bit to test the market. I agree we don't need to pay overs and remain in the player roster we have. We need to get new and better players to challenge the competition.

Having said that this year has been so disappointing because we have quality players but none of them have been consistent. If they played as a team week in week out we would be in the top 4. What is the point of playing the big teams, play well, then loose to the bottom 4 teams. Seriously that's about attitude.
 
Ever since I've joined this forum, you've absolutely despised Garrick, and I have no idea why. Like it isn't even about his position. You just think he's unimaginably terrible.

Did he knock up your daughter or something? Personally, I'd be congratulating my daughter...
CRPSI….Can’t Really Provide Sensible Info.
Enough said!
 
Think the issue here is about value. His worth or cost. yes, been great player for the club, goal kicker. That try he scored from our in-goal area after getting a spray from DCE a year ago or so - brilliant. The chase the other day - showed great heart. BUT, his contract was about his ability to grow tries from 4 to 6 points. Doesn't our new half back become a suitable replacement option? This affects his $ value.

Football is a business, it has a time limit, don't blame one little bit to test the market. I agree we don't need to pay overs and remain in the player roster we have. We need to get new and better players to challenge the competition.

Having said that this year has been so disappointing because we have quality players but none of them have been consistent. If they played as a team week in week out we would be in the top 4. What is the point of playing the big teams, play well, then loose to the bottom 4 teams. Seriously that's about attitude.
Ummm Koula, Garrick, Lehi, Simpkin, TKO have been pretty consistent all year just to name a few. All 3 Trbos have underperformed yet they seem to be the darlings of some in here.
 
Ummm Koula, Garrick, Lehi, Simpkin, TKO have been pretty consistent all year just to name a few. All 3 Trbos have underperformed yet they seem to be the darlings of some in here.
Think your referring to the season performance. Mate it's a team sport; they need to play as a team. Yes, I agree all of those players in individual games put in individual performances. but as a team, generally we sucked! the players did not match enthusiasm of other players.

None of the players you mentioned all played great games in the same game.
 
Honestly I think wingers now are not a position where you could pay for a cheaper player - they are just so critical

From getting sets going, defending / scoring off kicks it is not an area where you can fill in. I am not sure where the "value" is maybe in smaller forwards?
 
Honestly I think wingers now are not a position where you could pay for a cheaper player - they are just so critical

From getting sets going, defending / scoring off kicks it is not an area where you can fill in. I am not sure where the "value" is maybe in smaller forwards?

Agree.

This is exactly why I cant understand why Garrick, Lomax, etc are so desperate to play centre.

I'd pay more for a To'o type on the wing than just about any centre running around. It's such an important position.
 
The new frachise will have a clean slate and they'll probably get whoever they go after. We have salary cap issues and won't be able to compete, so it rests with the player if he'll take less to stay or doesn't want to move to Perth. We make him a reasonable offer and stick to it and if he goes so be it.
 
The new frachise will have a clean slate and they'll probably get whoever they go after. We have salary cap issues and won't be able to compete, so it rests with the player if he'll take less to stay or doesn't want to move to Perth. We make him a reasonable offer and stick to it and if he goes so be it.
Will the Bears have a higher salary cap initially than the other clubs?
They are going to have to pay 'overs' to attract talent.
 
In reality, Lehi is too light to play anywhere in the backline,
Matee he's our best player in the backline maybe even the whole team. He break tackle fend off bigger players the most in our team I think, too small my arss. Grandma traditional Tongan bbq pork with all the fats for a couple of weekend that'll fix it, he might b bigger than his old man soon. Only 20yrs old who know we might have just the forwards we been looking for, another Beaver/Kite would b nice indeed. LIONEL RICHIE is definitely a must keep...
 
CRPSI….Can’t Really Provide Sensible Info.
Enough said!
It's an unusual moniker so I looked it up one day. Those letters refer to a chronic pain syndrome.
So not sure if our Silvertails CRPSI (I used to think of him/her as 'Crispy', lol) has such a syndrome. But on reflection i could forgive anyone suffering chronic pain for being a little, er, brusque on occasion.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 24 19 0 5 148 44
2 Storm 24 17 0 7 212 40
3 Bulldogs 24 16 0 8 120 38
4 Broncos 24 15 0 9 172 36
5 Sharks 24 15 0 9 109 36
6 Warriors 24 14 0 10 21 34
7 Panthers 24 13 1 10 107 33
8 Roosters 24 13 0 11 132 32
9 Dolphins 24 12 0 12 125 30
10 Sea Eagles 24 12 0 12 21 30
11 Eels 24 10 0 14 -76 26
12 Cowboys 24 9 1 14 -146 25
13 Tigers 24 9 0 15 -135 24
14 Rabbitohs 24 9 0 15 -181 24
15 Dragons 24 8 0 16 -130 22
16 Titans 24 6 0 18 -199 18
17 Knights 24 6 0 18 -300 18
Back
Top Bottom