Where's that "ironic" post rating when you need it. I gave you a "winner" instead for guessing right.Have to be Zorba or Penn
Where's that "ironic" post rating when you need it. I gave you a "winner" instead for guessing right.Have to be Zorba or Penn
I'm especially glad now that I did not renew my MSE membership. I can only hope that more people join the FC. Now, more than ever. The FC will be here long after the fuceking Penn's are gone.
I dream of FC membership numbers being higher than MSE numbers. How sweet that would be.
And I plan on being a member even then Mark.🙂The FC was there in 1947, and still will be in 2047 100 years later.
Me tooAnd I plan on being a member even then Mark.🙂
Just had a look too .... wow, very sad. What a bunch of cnutsJust went on for a look myself, clearly @HappilyManly is spot on, zero reference anywhere on the website to the Sea Eagles and now only a portal to membership.
Some on here will be beside themselves (I can think of one in particular but he rarely posts now) at this, but for me its just bloody sad.
The holder of the preference share that deems the name, colours and holds the history of the club now cannot display any of this due to bloody minded politics.
A real low for me, and I imagine many others on here that have been long term members of the FC.
I wonder how the Golden Eagles Association feel about this one, or are they in the Bozo/Penn camp
We are all free to gift a membership to anybody. So long as they sign the form, you can pay the $25...
I dream of FC membership numbers being higher than MSE numbers. How sweet that would be.
I have re-joined the FC still haven't re-joined the Sea Eagles (I'm torn on that one)
Of course there could be a bigger story that the FC white-anted MWSE and this is just assertion of rights to make sure that it doesnt happen again.Why don't they have the balls to come out and publicly state what their intention is with the Football Club and its role in Manly's future, instead of undermining and white anting it at every opportunity. If you want to get rid of it and the preference share then say so, don't be gutless. They have already stated they consider the FC irrelevant, why the need to keep pathetically scoring revenge points unless there is a bigger agenda at play here. I hope and pray that there are enough passionate and committed people involved in the FC to keep in going long enough for the rift to be healed.
Neither the LC nor the FC have/had the board voting rights to do that.Of course there could be a bigger story that the FC white-anted MWSE and this is just assertion of rights to make sure that it doesnt happen again.
Pure speculation but we should consider that possibility
I agree Dan, two sides to a story?
The FC committee have been complicit in all the factional wars that have taken place over the last decade or so. They have fired as many shots at the owners as the owners have taken at them including using the media etc. Unfortunately for them to the victors go the spoils.
For the record some of this recent 'stuff' is the pathetic (inc. life members) and yes I wish everyone in the club could work collaboratively together for the betterment of the team.
To achieve this the FC has to move on some of the old antagonists on from the board, review their membership structure and come up with a strategy on how they can promote and grow Rugby League in the district for the betterment of the Sea Eagles.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |