Because we aren’t Easts and aren’t permitted to sign an international in every position. Parker, Jorge and Reuben are doing their job.Why persevere with Garrick Parker and Taufua. We know there ceiling and while they have good traits, their ceiling is simply not high enough.
parker to back row? Just no.
Most of the other clubs don’t have a salary cap sombrero either but are working their young talent into the side. Depends what is the goal. If it’s getting blokes to simply do the job and being fringe contenders then our outside backs are fine.And without Tom beside them we just make up the numbers If it’s about starting to build a team that can actually win a flag then it simply pushes that goal down the track. It’s a decade since we won. Not very Manly like.Because we aren’t Easts and aren’t permitted to sign an international in every position. Parker, Jorge and Reuben are doing their job.
Or when the pigs are cats?.... when our pigs dog it ...
Don"t think that the forwards particularly let Manly down against the Dragons , actually had the Dragon"s measure after 20 minutes or so , was mainly just the regular turnovers , especially in the 2 nd half and some very lucky Dragons tries . Take your point about a pack that can at least hold their own or better still get on the front foot but again they were not the main problem recently against the Dragons .It is a story as old as Rugby League .... when our pigs dog it ... like against Dragons .... our halves and backs get smashed
When our pigs rip in like last week against Parra .... our halves and backs compete well ....
Why people think this narrative will change anytime soon is a mystery ...
Don"t think that the forwards particularly let Manly down against the Dragons , actually had the Dragon"s measure after 20 minutes or so , was mainly just the regular turnovers , especially in the 2 nd half and some very lucky Dragons tries . Take your point about a pack that can at least hold their own or better still get on the front foot but again they were not the main problem recently against the Dragons .
You're hallucinating
...
Usually pretty much with you Al, but seen that game totally differently....the Illawarra pack owned the middle from the outset and their tempo/energy was far more intense than Manly's.Don"t think that the forwards particularly let Manly down against the Dragons , actually had the Dragon"s measure after 20 minutes or so , was mainly just the regular turnovers , especially in the 2 nd half and some very lucky Dragons tries . Take your point about a pack that can at least hold their own or better still get on the front foot but again they were not the main problem recently against the Dragons .
Agree 100% Also let’s not forget we are still at around $13 to win the comp last I looked. I’d like to believe we have expert insight here at ST but I think our large scale betting agencies have a bit more riding on results than a few bruised egos on this forum. We are currently 5th favorite and a number of media “experts” had us winning the comp this year or at least the Smokey for it. Still maintain this comp is very close and any team can win when they turn up to play on the day. I just hope we turn up tonight and not the cows.Cows have brought through a few young guns but take into account where that club is at. You know where they finished last year? And I think the year before was similar. They just sacked their coach! Clearly they are aiming at a bit of a rebuild/refresh.
Manly on the other hand finished strongly last year, we've been building a solid base, so we can bring in our new talent selectively and when they are ready to improve the side. The injuries we've had make it look as though the team is weak but our record against the top sides gives a better indication of where we're at, I think.
We should be ok, and @Woodsie may agree with me, the cows pigs are dogs.I just hope we turn up tonight and not the cows.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |