Dragons Show us how its done.

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by PEPSI, Jun 13, 2005.



Share This Page

  1. PEPSI

    By:PEPSIJun 13, 2005
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,578
    Likes Received:
    1
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2 /0
    While we are dishing out the "we had six players out" excuse, spare a thought for the dragons, they lose there two quality front rowers, easily the best at club level. They lose there two strike centres, they lose there 5/8 and captain .

    They are playing one of the premiership front runners, not souths! and the cowboys have only 1 forward missing from there regular line up.

    Then they lose there half back about 15 mins in. No dramas, the full back has moved to 5/8 and the hooker moves to half back. These guys then manage to control the team, move them around the park and they give the cowboys a mini touch up.

    That is a quality side. Wont start bagging monaghs again as its been said enough, but over this weekend, both Moran at souths and Innes at saints have also proven themselves very capable half backs.
     
  2. ManlyBacker

    By:ManlyBackerJun 13, 2005
    Winging it
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    11,597
    Likes Received:
    843
    Likes Given:
    738
    Ratings:
    +972 /7
    I must say this pleases me as the all this crap is getting more than tedious.

    Your comments are good ones and highlights how Manly currently doesn't have a game plan outside of having a great back row. I will beat CW and say that this weekend is the real test ;) 8|
     
  3. Crushercleal

    By:CrusherclealJun 13, 2005
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,065
    Likes Received:
    1
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4 /0
    Nope MB, next weekend against the Dogs is a much bigger test. We'll touch up the Knights, but the Dogs are another matter.
     
  4. byso

    By:bysoJun 13, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,616
    Likes Received:
    89
    Likes Given:
    101
    Ratings:
    +113 /0
    It shows the lack of depth we have.

    It doesn't show that one player is the blame when we lose!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  5. KaZa

    By:KaZaJun 13, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,159
    Likes Received:
    203
    Likes Given:
    19
    Ratings:
    +412 /29
    lol you guys are clutching at straws
     
  6. Fluffy

    By:FluffyJun 13, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,612
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +7,016 /273
    Cowboys were really missing their 6 or so players that are out because of origin.

    All this has shown that its not the half back or the props that get the team over the line

    add to that the storm result - missing 2 of their star backs they struggled and couldnt beat the warriors who arnt a top team this year either, still with orford.
     
  7. KaZa

    By:KaZaJun 13, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,159
    Likes Received:
    203
    Likes Given:
    19
    Ratings:
    +412 /29
    haha but Orford is the messiah ;)
     
  8. Kiwi Eagle

    By:Kiwi EagleJun 13, 2005
    Moderator
    Staff Member 2018 Tipping Competitor

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    15,577
    Likes Received:
    2,233
    Likes Given:
    300
    Ratings:
    +5,239 /84
    And Jones shat all over him :D
     
  9. fLIP

    By:fLIPJun 13, 2005
    UFO Hunter

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,391
    Likes Received:
    559
    Likes Given:
    158
    Ratings:
    +2,685 /69
    We lost guys. Move on. Its Newcastle this week, that would be embarrasing.
     
  10. Garts

    By:GartsJun 13, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,603
    Likes Received:
    394
    Likes Given:
    76
    Ratings:
    +947 /27
    the dragons win just shows our lack of depth in comparison, nothing else.
     
  11. Fluffy

    By:FluffyJun 13, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,612
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +7,016 /273
    how??

    dragons played an equally weakened side.

    We played an almost full strength side

    Id say it shows the salary cap is making the comp closer
     
  12. gomanly

    By:gomanlyJun 13, 2005
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    2
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +29 /2
    you also have to remember that most of those st george players have seen plenty of first grade footy, it wasnt like it was a big step up for them.
     
  13. Matabele

    By:MatabeleJun 13, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    23,081
    Likes Received:
    457
    Likes Given:
    63
    Ratings:
    +516 /14
    The Cowboys had quite a few missing too.
     
  14. PEPSI

    By:PEPSIJun 13, 2005
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,578
    Likes Received:
    1
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2 /0

    one of your best Fluff, agree, not sure why teams chase big name props and halves, they should all be out buying wingers!
     
  15. sue ridgepipe

    By:sue ridgepipeJun 14, 2005
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2 /0
    1,6,7,9 are the key positions in any side.storm had 1,6 and 9 out,all great players.they got beat by 8 by a team who has ,with the exception of saints ,not been beaten by more than 8 all year and who have beaten brisbane at home..we lose to second last souths by 40-their biggest win in 25 years over anyone-please dont insult us by comparing those 2 results.
     
  16. Fluffy

    By:FluffyJun 14, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,612
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +7,016 /273
    Well maybe we should look at our 1,6 as well as 7 and 9
     
  17. Duff

    By:DuffJun 14, 2005
    Well-Known Member
    2018 Tipping Competitor

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    3,352
    Likes Received:
    325
    Likes Given:
    45
    Ratings:
    +648 /14
    There seems to be too much reliance on BK & Beaver to move the team around the park. I don't know who to blame for this or what the cause is. They just lacked direction. I don't know that you can pick any one position as being more important than others, it comes down to each team and their way of doing things. We are run by the back row, our halves are distributors & kickers, not such a bad thing but there has to be a plan B if this becomes inappropriate. Stewy needs to keep building in confidence to run the defence as Ridge used to do (not hassleing his personal game though) and this will come with time & coaching, there is evidence of it happening, slowly.
    Maybe the answer is to employ a Bob Fulton or Matthew Ridge on our coaching panel. Both were capable of playing as halves, runners, defenders, kickers & leaders where appropriate.
     
  18. Ryan

    By:RyanJun 14, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    17,887
    Likes Received:
    4,517
    Likes Given:
    729
    Ratings:
    +13,314 /613
    Duff, A Hooker, 1/2 back, 5/8 & fullback to some extent "steer" the team around the park (hence why they are called the playmakers).
    I think our fullback is strong, we are weak in the Hooking role until Dunley comes on, our 5/8 is solid whilst not being outstanding......and that is as far as I go.
    Monnas should look at his game from last weekend. I'm sure he KNOWS he can improve, and will do his utmost to do that.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
Top