It's a big list of Manly legends or near legends, not just players, I can't bear to watch leave the way they did.
103 games. Gives him a better strike rate than all those wingers above him on the try scoring list.must say I am surprised by a previous post that he has 66 tries....doesn't seem like he played that long to score so many.
Great player until he broke his neck. Did extremely well to come back as good as he did from that, but was never the same player again.Wolfie....above average first grader made to look even better on the end of a world class back line.
@HoldenV8 where do you get your stats from mate ?? You always seem to have a handy supply and I'm a bit of a stat freak tooIn terms of actually playing and scoring on the wing (rather than the number scored overall no matter what position), the Manly wingers list reads (30 tries or more):
Tom Mooney - 83 tries, 163 games (50.92%)
David Williams - 66 tries, 103 games (64.07%)
Michael Robertson - 59 tries, 120 games (49.16%)
Craig Hancock - 55 tries, 126 games (43.65%)
Nick Yakich - 52 tries, 74 games (70.27%)
Jorge Taufua - 50 tries, 82 games (60.97%)
Scott Donald - 48 tries, 68 games (70.58%)
John Hopoate - 46 tries, 88 games (52.27%)
Ken Irvine - 41 tries, 60 games (68.33%)
Johnny Bliss - 41 tries, 71 games (57.74%)
John Ribot - 33 tries, 53 games (62.26%)
Stuart Davis - 33 tries, 86 games (38.37%)
Kerry Boustead - 30 tries, 66 games (45.45%)
Mooney scored the most tries on the Manly flank while Scott Donald has the highest strike rate for those with 30 or more tries.
Just for note, if you put that lot into a 100 metre foot race, I would say the top 3 would be Irvine, Bliss and Yakich. Not sure who'd run last though, probably Hoppa or Jorge lol.
Agree with all of that.Part of being a champion is consistency and durability. Williams had neither and although I like him, he is not a Manly great, just a good winger in his day. If he wasn't such a character, he wouldn't even have this thread; just ask Michael Robertson.
That's brilliant HoldenV8. ThanksIts complicated. REAL complicated 😛
Rugby League Project.
Do a Google search for Rugby League Tables.....that site is also very useful.
Cheers, I use those two. Thought you might have had another secret source.Its complicated. REAL complicated 😛
Rugby League Project.
Do a Google search for Rugby League Tables.....that site is also very useful.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |