Cronk to manly rumour

[/QUOTE]
every single post you make especially during games is anti manly. signing Cronk is a big no. 1st he's a
You are full of it chief

Take off your glasses buddy

Cronk is a quality player reguardless

he is yeah but we don't need him. You got no clue mate honestly there is no point with you. Your no manly fan in my eyes. we need a forward and a 2nd rower. what would we do with green? you want to put 2 million into 2 players. geez mate lucky your not in charge. With the Stewart and Mata money we can get a few quality players with that and need to be smart to insure our future but no you want to throw the bank at cronk like the chequebook clubs do ie Parra roosters and dogs. We are manly we need him not. All the best in your future endeavors you pelican
 
every single post you make especially during games is anti manly. signing Cronk is a big no. 1st he's a


he is yeah but we don't need him. You got no clue mate honestly there is no point with you. Your no manly fan in my eyes. we need a forward and a 2nd rower. what would we do with green? you want to put 2 million into 2 players. geez mate lucky your not in charge. With the Stewart and Mata money we can get a few quality players with that and need to be smart to insure our future but no you want to throw the bank at cronk like the chequebook clubs do ie Parra roosters and dogs. We are manly we need him not. All the best in your future endeavors you pelican[/QUOTE]





hhahahahahahahahahahahahaha

That all you got?

I'm more a Manly fan than you will ever be champ

Hope you've had a great day manning your keyboard!
 
I had an old girlfriend that would frequent the corner of darlinghurst rd back in the day and she would make a better 9 then Cherry-Evans.

Fair enough. Put her at 9 then and DCE can come off the bench.

Hopefully his wife is ok with that.
 
I hope this is bull**** i dont want a long term storm player coming anywhere near manly thieving our money, for what a year or 2, F..k off cronk.
I understand the storm sentiments; however, he is the one storm big three that I would want and he and cherry would be the ultimate halves combo.
 
every single post you make especially during games is anti manly. signing Cronk is a big no. 1st he's a


he is yeah but we don't need him. You got no clue mate honestly there is no point with you. Your no manly fan in my eyes. we need a forward and a 2nd rower. what would we do with green? you want to put 2 million into 2 players. geez mate lucky your not in charge. With the Stewart and Mata money we can get a few quality players with that and need to be smart to insure our future but no you want to throw the bank at cronk like the chequebook clubs do ie Parra roosters and dogs. We are manly we need him not. All the best in your future endeavors you pelican





hhahahahahahahahahahahahaha

That all you got?

I'm more a Manly fan than you will ever be champ

Hope you've had a great day manning your keyboard![/QUOTE]
LOL what a clown.

you know nothing Jon snow

why do you wrote like this

guess your the biggest manly fan in here that's why every post is negative and or stupid
 
I wouldn't be against it, we can just give him the Matai/Stewart money and look within for forwards. Right second row is our only real big issue anyway.

6. DCE
7. Cronk
9. Green

14. Api

Green would be a very similar hooker to MMonas, and Api is the L'estrange. It's a very long shot, if it doesn't happen I won't be upset as we can strengthen elsewhere, if it does happen I won't be upset because we'd go from Top 8 potential in 2018 to contenders.
Personally I think Hastings would be the best 9, Green couldn't handle the defence. If Cronk did come, either Green would be released, or he would battle it out with Api for the utility. I think Hastings will own the 9 next year.
 
If Cronk and Green are familiar with each other wouldn't you play them as halves and DCE as hooker?
A big no on that one. DCE is our half for the next 6 years yet, and he runs rings around Green.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
1 1 0 38 2
1 1 0 36 2
1 1 0 30 2
1 1 0 22 2
1 1 0 8 2
1 1 0 6 2
1 1 0 2 2
1 1 0 2 2
0 0 0 0 2
1 0 1 -2 0
1 0 1 -2 0
1 0 1 -6 0
1 0 1 -8 0
1 0 1 -22 0
1 0 1 -30 0
1 0 1 -36 0
1 0 1 -38 0
Back
Top Bottom