Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Crap players thread:

Status
Not open for further replies.

Matabele

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
23,083
Reaction score
529
Just a summary of what was lost yesterday:

King = soft and uninvolved.

Randall = soft and error riddled.

Stephenson = collar grabber and slow.

Monaghan = Can't run a bath let alone run a football side around a paddock.
 

byso

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
9,622
Reaction score
128
Gee I hope this thread doesn't get Deleted Mata!!

How about you tell us how Joe Williams is better than Monas?
 

Matabele

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
23,083
Reaction score
529
ONE FINAL TIME:

Given the same pack of forwards and opportunity I believe Williams would achieve far more than Monaghan over the next decade. Do you really dispute that?
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,156
Reaction score
7,850
You missed a few

Witt - completely owned by riddel and very poor

Kite - errors galore

Hicks - was asleep in attack a few times
 

lasvegas

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
898
Reaction score
5
i agree , i know management really wanted him last year in place of the caped crusader , sorry super hero oops i meant monas.why is there so much loyalty towards this guy,a reserve grader from canberra.
 

Matabele

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
23,083
Reaction score
529
A reserve grader who couldn't even convince his brother to join the club and a reserve grader without the gumption to tell his manager to piss off and sign a contract on his own merits.
 

byso

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
9,622
Reaction score
128
[quote author='smallblacktext'>[ Edited Tue May 24 2005, 07:57AM ]</span>
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited Tue May 24 2005, 08:00AM ]</span>
 

The Wheel

https://membership.seaeagles.com.au/
Premium Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
16,278
Reaction score
15,747
We only lost by 6 lads - but it was a very winnable game.
 

PEPSI

Active Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
2,578
Reaction score
2
i think Wheels sums it up, the game was there to win, we where camped in there quarter, they lost the ball on their try line on the first tackle etc, they couldnt score in the second half, everything was in our favour, but no one with the ball in hand could get us over the try line. Its fine to say its hard for a half back when your forwards where getting smashed, but in this case the forward battle was 50/50 at worst and some would say we where even better than them in the forwards but we still didnt manage to cross that white line.

That game was well and truly there to be one.

Saw some highlights last night and watched Beavers try, set up by Witt with a very simple decoy runner/second man play move. Its not such a hard game from 10 meters out!
 

Volley

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
4,284
Reaction score
1,517
You missed a few

Hicks - was asleep in attack a few times

I thought Hicks was very good on Friday considering the lack of ball he received. That knock-on came from a terrible pass which was right out in front of him, on the first tackle after a scrum. That's about the only thing I can recall that could be termed as being asleep in attack.

I'll say it now, put Hicks back in the Centres. He's too good to be stuck out on the wing getting nothing.
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,156
Reaction score
7,850
He was asleep on that one - yes the pass was infront of him but he was behind the play, seemed to be running at tezzas pace, not stewy's. Prob a bit harsh, but an example of when monas furked up close to the line.

Beaver dropping that ball was inexcusable.

2 stuff ups - not by monas, when we were camped in the second half.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

2020 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Panthers 20 18 1 1 299 37
2 Storm 20 16 0 4 258 32
3 Eels 20 15 0 5 104 30
4 Roosters 20 14 0 6 230 28
5 Raiders 20 14 0 6 128 28
6 Rabbitohs 20 12 0 8 169 24
7 Knights 20 11 1 8 47 23
8 Sharks 20 10 0 10 0 20
9 Titans 20 9 0 11 -117 18
10 Warriors 20 8 0 12 -115 16
11 Tigers 20 7 0 13 -65 14
12 Dragons 20 7 0 13 -74 14
13 Sea Eagles 20 7 0 13 -134 14
14 Cowboys 20 5 0 15 -152 10
15 Bulldogs 20 3 0 17 -222 6
16 Broncos 20 3 0 17 -356 6
Top Bottom