"Close Proximity"

Rynostradamus

Reserve Grader
Okay so I can't claim to be a scholar of the international rule book for our game.

So first things first. Has anyone ever heard of a shepperd judgement based on rugby league rules called "Close proximity"?

I ask first as a Manly Warringah supporter. Turbo was denied the first try of the test match due to this invented Call.

I ask second because my punters club stood to win a motza if turbo scored first in the first try scorers market.

The back rower did not go through the line. Yet he was called for obstruction when he stopped before the line. Nor was their any touch of any defender. He stopped behind the man with the ball.

So the video ref to my knowledge invented an excuse. Again happy to be schooled on this.

After watching our players and club be scrutinised and cleared for match and spot fixing at what point do the Police investigate officials. 1 official is easier to influence than a team. As evidenced in many sports around the globe.

I think the Police should be looking at the payout trail from the first try scorers market in tonight's game.

A long shot forward vs the favourite. House wins.

I think gambling in league should be banned. The officials and the players need protecting. As do clubs and fans.

To quote the great man "there needs to be an investigation". It needs to happen now before the criminals win; year to year, month to month, game to game.

Nuff said.
 
Okay so I can't claim to be a scholar of the international rule book for our game.

So first things first. Has anyone ever heard of a shepperd judgement based on rugby league rules called "Close proximity"?

I ask first as a Manly Warringah supporter. Turbo was denied the first try of the test match due to this invented Call.

I ask second because my punters club stood to win a motza if turbo scored first in the first try scorers market.

The back rower did not go through the line. Yet he was called for obstruction when he stopped before the line. Nor was their any touch of any defender. He stopped behind the man with the ball.

So the video ref to my knowledge invented an excuse. Again happy to be schooled on this.

After watching our players and club be scrutinised and cleared for match and spot fixing at what point do the Police investigate officials. 1 official is easier to influence than a team. As evidenced in many sports around the globe.

I think the Police should be looking at the payout trail from the first try scorers market in tonight's game.

A long shot forward vs the favourite. House wins.

I think gambling in league should be banned. The officials and the players need protecting. As do clubs and fans.

To quote the great man "there needs to be an investigation". It needs to happen now before the criminals win; year to year, month to month, game to game.

Nuff said.
Um the house always wins.
 
Is it a rule defined by an extent?
Its just part of the obstruction rule.

Whilst the French player wasn't touched by the Roos player, he could not sidestep to tackle the ball career due to the Roos decoy standing right in his face.

______
Obstruction
The indicators for an obstruction include:
1. (a) ‘Block’* or ‘Flat’ runner (who do not receive the ball) must not stop in the middle of the defensive line
(b) ‘Block’ or ‘Flat’ runner (who do not receive the ball) must not run at (chest or outside shoulder of) defender
and initiate contact
(c) The Referee or Review Officials can determine the significance of contact initiated by the ‘Block’ or ‘Flat’
runner (who does not receive the ball) in impeding a defender’s involvement in a try scoring play
 
Last edited:
Its just part of the obstruction rule.

Whilst the French player wasn't touched by the Roos player, he could not sidestep to tackle the ball career due to the Roos decoy standing right in his face.

______
Obstruction
The indicators for an obstruction include:
1. (a) ‘Block’* or ‘Flat’ runner (who do not receive the ball) must not stop in the middle of the defensive line
(b) ‘Block’ or ‘Flat’ runner (who do not receive the ball) must not run at (chest or outside shoulder of) defender
and initiate contact
(c) The Referee or Review Officials can determine the significance of contact initiated by the ‘Block’ or ‘Flat’
runner (who does not receive the ball) in impeding a defender’s involvement in a try scoring play
So the rules agree with me
 
Its just part of the obstruction rule.

Whilst the French player wasn't touched by the Roos player, he could not sidestep to tackle the ball career due to the Roos decoy standing right in his face.

______
Obstruction
The indicators for an obstruction include:
1. (a) ‘Block’* or ‘Flat’ runner (who do not receive the ball) must not stop in the middle of the defensive line
(b) ‘Block’ or ‘Flat’ runner (who do not receive the ball) must not run at (chest or outside shoulder of) defender
and initiate contact
(c) The Referee or Review Officials can determine the significance of contact initiated by the ‘Block’ or ‘Flat’
runner (who does not receive the ball) in impeding a defender’s involvement in a try scoring play
I do not see the words close proximity in the rules
 
I quite like the international reffing and thought they have been great so far. That was a shepherd. Feel bad for Turbo and your betting team but there it is.
 
Okay so I can't claim to be a scholar of the international rule book for our game.

So first things first. Has anyone ever heard of a shepperd judgement based on rugby league rules called "Close proximity"?

I ask first as a Manly Warringah supporter. Turbo was denied the first try of the test match due to this invented Call.

I ask second because my punters club stood to win a motza if turbo scored first in the first try scorers market.

The back rower did not go through the line. Yet he was called for obstruction when he stopped before the line. Nor was their any touch of any defender. He stopped behind the man with the ball.

So the video ref to my knowledge invented an excuse. Again happy to be schooled on this.

After watching our players and club be scrutinised and cleared for match and spot fixing at what point do the Police investigate officials. 1 official is easier to influence than a team. As evidenced in many sports around the globe.

I think the Police should be looking at the payout trail from the first try scorers market in tonight's game.

A long shot forward vs the favourite. House wins.

I think gambling in league should be banned. The officials and the players need protecting. As do clubs and fans.

To quote the great man "there needs to be an investigation". It needs to happen now before the criminals win; year to year, month to month, game to game.

Nuff said.
I know I probably sound like a wowser, but gambling is a blight on the game and always has been in my view.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 24 19 0 5 148 44
2 Storm 24 17 0 7 212 40
3 Bulldogs 24 16 0 8 120 38
4 Broncos 24 15 0 9 172 36
5 Sharks 24 15 0 9 109 36
6 Warriors 24 14 0 10 21 34
7 Panthers 24 13 1 10 107 33
8 Roosters 24 13 0 11 132 32
9 Dolphins 24 12 0 12 125 30
10 Sea Eagles 24 12 0 12 21 30
11 Eels 24 10 0 14 -76 26
12 Cowboys 24 9 1 14 -146 25
13 Tigers 24 9 0 15 -135 24
14 Rabbitohs 24 9 0 15 -181 24
15 Dragons 24 8 0 16 -130 22
16 Titans 24 6 0 18 -199 18
17 Knights 24 6 0 18 -300 18
Back
Top Bottom