Chris Walker

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by Crushercleal, Jun 18, 2005.



Share This Page

  1. Crushercleal

    By:CrusherclealJun 18, 2005
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,065
    Likes Received:
    1
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4 /0
    What do you guys think about Chris Walker? I know he's a prat, and sometimes he goes missing in defence, but the guy does score tries and would be very useful in attack. Should we make a play for him? He would definitely come cheap.
     
  2. Duff

    By:DuffJun 18, 2005
    Well-Known Member
    2018 Tipping Competitor

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    3,352
    Likes Received:
    325
    Likes Given:
    45
    Ratings:
    +648 /14
    We've already got fast wingers whose devensive lapses come into question on occasions. Walker is worse again, maybe he has a slightly better line breaking ability, but he wouldn't add much to the team.
     
  3. Fro

    By:FroJun 18, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    8,427
    Likes Received:
    188
    Likes Given:
    201
    Ratings:
    +302 /0
    yep, he can play with Andrew Walker, Ken McGuinness, Solo, Hoppa, and all the other "reformed characters" we have bought and then tossed a while later,

    The Too Hard Basket must be getting pretty full by now.
     
  4. ManlyBacker

    By:ManlyBackerJun 18, 2005
    Winging it
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    11,597
    Likes Received:
    843
    Likes Given:
    738
    Ratings:
    +972 /7
    I am just going to say NO. He rates up at the top of my most disliked players, for all sorts of reasons.
     
  5. Fro

    By:FroJun 18, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    8,427
    Likes Received:
    188
    Likes Given:
    201
    Ratings:
    +302 /0
    theres got to be other discards we can waste some money on
     
  6. Fluffy

    By:FluffyJun 18, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,542
    Likes Received:
    1,889
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +6,932 /271
    FCUK OFF

    Why downgrade from hicks or Don - at least they can make some tackles
     
  7. Matabele

    By:MatabeleJun 18, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    23,081
    Likes Received:
    457
    Likes Given:
    63
    Ratings:
    +516 /14
    Donald and walker are in the same category - quick but frial in defence.

    I'd rather Donald.
     
  8. Canteen Worker

    By:Canteen WorkerJun 18, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    13,244
    Likes Received:
    187
    Likes Given:
    100
    Ratings:
    +215 /5
    No thanks - he can take a running hike as far as I am concerned or go back to Souths!!!
     
  9. PEPSI

    By:PEPSIJun 18, 2005
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,578
    Likes Received:
    1
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2 /0
    the biggest difference between Walker ( and im not suggesting we sign him) and Donald and Hicks is that Hicksy and Donald are good finishers, but rely on someone inside them to put them in space, get them behind the defence etc.

    Walker while inconsistant can turn a game, makes busts all over the field and can create a try for himself. hes awesome trailing the forwards looking for off loads, our wingers dont seem to bother to do that.
     
  10. Stevie

    By:StevieJun 19, 2005
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    910
    Likes Received:
    58
    Likes Given:
    13
    Ratings:
    +93 /0
    Only way I would sign Walker is if one of the Turnstyles broke at the main gate
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
Top