birds eye view.

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by sue ridgepipe, Mar 20, 2006.



Share This Page

  1. sue ridgepipe

    By:sue ridgepipeMar 20, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    I am very surprised at a lot of the stuff written about our loss.I have been a big doubter but i saw a lot i liked.we had seats on halfway close to the fence and believe me that was one tough physical match.the cowboys players looked like they were in a car crash when spotted later on. we were still lacking combination in attack but our goalline defence was nothing short of sensational.you give that side that much ball and they usually win by 50.

    the changes worked well.robertson is a genuine classy winger,burns was a good link man(very physical match and for a first up effort was promising but must work on his discipline)),menzies at centre is a simple reflection of the fact we dont have any centres.des has got little room to move there.

    props are a real concern.bryant is head and shoulders above the rest atm.maintain that attitude and add a little combination and we will win our fair share.i suppose the point is I am a hell of a lot more hopeful after that game that we can be competitive against top sides.
     
  2. Fluffy

    By:FluffyMar 20, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,465
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +6,814 /266
    cheers Sue,

    its always good to get a perspective from the ground as they are often quite different to what comes from the TV.
     
  3. fLIP

    By:fLIPMar 20, 2006
    UFO Hunter

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,239
    Likes Received:
    520
    Likes Given:
    155
    Ratings:
    +2,172 /51
    Agree on Roberston. That was the first time i'd seen him in action and to be honest he must have been unlucky to miss the first round. Then again, maybe im not so shocked that he didn't get a run.

    Bryant is tearing it up so far. I don't know what happened over the off season but he's making King look like he should be playing backyard footy at best.

    Im happy with the defence. Attack is a little unorganised but I feel the idea is there.
     
  4. Canteen Worker

    By:Canteen WorkerMar 20, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    13,244
    Likes Received:
    187
    Likes Given:
    100
    Ratings:
    +215 /5
    Great post. I have been trying to say something similar and getting trashed for it from the glass half-empty crowd. It was a step in the right direction after an embarrassing first up loss at Brookie!

    I agree the centres are a worry. Everyone is trashing Des about putting Beaver in the centres but the same posters were talking about 40 points through Matai! Can't have it both ways. Stepho may have been an option but every time he has played against top class centres he has been ordinary in defence!
     
  5. Garts

    By:GartsMar 20, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,596
    Likes Received:
    394
    Likes Given:
    76
    Ratings:
    +935 /25
    good post. we all know the areas we need to improve, its good to look at the positive side now and then.

    lets just hope we turn up with the same attitude to defence this weekend.
     
  6. Stevie

    By:StevieMar 20, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    908
    Likes Received:
    57
    Likes Given:
    13
    Ratings:
    +67 /0
    I think Burns will be named at 6 this week , Monas @ 9
    Dunners Bench , Leave Steppa at centre where he played most of the 2nd half , Robertson to wing , Anyone heard about Watmough he went off injured near the end looked like a knee ?
     
  7. Jatz Crackers

    By:Jatz CrackersMar 20, 2006
    Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Messages:
    9,342
    Likes Received:
    1,213
    Likes Given:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1,641 /10
    I agree the centres are a worry. Everyone is trashing Des about putting Beaver in the centres but the same posters were talking about 40 points through Matai! Can't have it both ways. Stepho may have been an option but every time he has played against top class centres he has been ordinary in defence!
    [/quote]

    1) Good to see a positive post Sue. Goodonya.

    2) Cmom CW, what on earth is all that about Menzies/Mattai in the centres. I and plenty of others have been calling for Hicks (who is a centre) to partner Bell, with Robbo & Steppa on each wing. Now for the life of me I cant understand whats wrong with that ?
    If anyone thinks thats a bad lineup then please say so here and explain why !
     
  8. Canteen Worker

    By:Canteen WorkerMar 20, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    13,244
    Likes Received:
    187
    Likes Given:
    100
    Ratings:
    +215 /5
    Hicks in the centre would be a good option. Stop gap solutions are not warranted. Hicks was on record saying he wanted to play wing.

    He has looked much better this year and his work to get that inside ball to Stewart was great. He did some good defensive work too!
     
  9. Jatz Crackers

    By:Jatz CrackersMar 20, 2006
    Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Messages:
    9,342
    Likes Received:
    1,213
    Likes Given:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1,641 /10
    Id hate to think that the reasons why Hicks isnt in the centres is because he doesnt want to do it, and maybe also that JL joining us next year has something to do with maintaining him on the wing ? But that would be crazy stuff wouldnt it ?

    I mean, given our current circumstances regarding centres and Robbo impressing on the wing as he did, it just makes sense.
     
  10. JEF

    By:JEFMar 20, 2006
    Active Member
    2018 Tipping Competitor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2004
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    28
    Likes Given:
    15
    Ratings:
    +154 /4
    Hicks and Bell in the centres.
    Burns at 5/8.
    Monaghan at hooker.
    Robertson and Stephenson on the wings.
    King and Dunley in Premiers.
    Cuthbertson on the bench.

    Now wer're looking dangerous, in my opinion.
     
  11. Dan

    By:DanMar 20, 2006
    Kim Jong Dan
    Staff Member Administrator 2018 Tipping Competitor

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    34,393
    Likes Received:
    4,449
    Likes Given:
    1,465
    Ratings:
    +8,625 /137
    i cant stomach dunners in pl. he plays into his own in ost games. this is likely his last season anyway
     
  12. Stillman

    By:StillmanMar 20, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005
    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    3
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8 /0
    My side would look something like this

    (1)Stewart
    (2) Robertson
    (3) Bell
    (4) Hicks
    (5) Stephenson
    (6) Burns- Why he didnt kick isntead of Orford i dont know
    (7) Orford
    (8) Bryant
    (9) Ballin
    (10) Rose
    (11) Kite
    (12) Watmough
    (13) Kennedy

    (14) Monaghan
    (15) Menzies
    (16) Cuthbo
    (17) Leuluai
     
  13. Fro

    By:FroMar 20, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    8,427
    Likes Received:
    188
    Likes Given:
    201
    Ratings:
    +302 /0
    How many seats did you need to buy to fit that tidy butt of yours Sue:)
     
  14. Dan

    By:DanMar 20, 2006
    Kim Jong Dan
    Staff Member Administrator 2018 Tipping Competitor

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    34,393
    Likes Received:
    4,449
    Likes Given:
    1,465
    Ratings:
    +8,625 /137
    Not bad mine would read

    My side would look something like this

    (1)Stewart
    (2) Robertson
    (3) Bell
    (4) Hicks
    (5) Stephenson
    (6) Burns- Why he didnt kick isntead of Orford i dont know
    (7) Orford
    (8) Bryant
    (9) Ballin
    (10) Kite
    (11) Watmough
    (12) Menzies
    (13) Kennedy

    (14) Dunley
    (15) Rose
    (16) Cuthbo
    (17) Leuluai

    Willow mite slip onto the bench instead of Rose though

    Monas to PL
     
  15. Garts

    By:GartsMar 20, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,596
    Likes Received:
    394
    Likes Given:
    76
    Ratings:
    +935 /25
    pretty much agree but Dunley to PL and Monas on the bench instead. Rose or Willow? Im not sure, I would be happy with either.
     
  16. Matabele

    By:MatabeleMar 20, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    23,081
    Likes Received:
    457
    Likes Given:
    63
    Ratings:
    +516 /14
    What part of my "There's hope IF" thread did you not understand?
     
  17. Fro

    By:FroMar 20, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    8,427
    Likes Received:
    188
    Likes Given:
    201
    Ratings:
    +302 /0
    The hope bit Matas, even a glimmer of optimism is so out of character for you its probably been overlooked as a typo :dance: :dance:
     
  18. KaZa

    By:KaZaMar 20, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,155
    Likes Received:
    203
    Likes Given:
    19
    Ratings:
    +402 /24
    I agree Sue.

    Id like to see Stepho get another go at centre. hes bulked up a bit got a bit faster.. looks like his defence has got a little better too. Give him another go if Hicks wont be played there.
     
  19. Canteen Worker

    By:Canteen WorkerMar 20, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    13,244
    Likes Received:
    187
    Likes Given:
    100
    Ratings:
    +215 /5
    What part of my "There's hope IF" thread did you not understand?

    [/quote]That was a great post and one in which I heartily agreed. I steered clear though once the 'cuddlel pubic hair references hijacked the thread. 8)
     
  20. Guest

    By:GuestMar 20, 2006
    Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    One game doesn't make a season and we need to improve further on that performance if we are to beat the best teams. We also need to be consistant and show that type of form every week.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
Top