Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
Garts said:Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
If some is continually charged with drink driving do you think they should be penalised more severely than a first time offender?
Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
The Eagle said:Garts said:Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
If some is continually charged with drink driving do you think they should be penalised more severely than a first time offender?
I thought common law said a man shouldn't have evidence from his previous similar offenses weighed against him with new charges
Volley said:Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
Hi Rex, Garts answered for me.
I think Matai would get the same charge, but loading would increase his punishment.
The Eagle said:Garts said:Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
If some is continually charged with drink driving do you think they should be penalised more severely than a first time offender?
I thought common law said a man shouldn't have evidence from his previous similar offenses weighed against him with new charges
As fro said, guilt from prior offences can't be used to prove guilt of a new charge, but it can be used in sentencing.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 24 | 19 | 0 | 5 | 148 | 44 |
2 | Storm | 24 | 17 | 0 | 7 | 212 | 40 |
3 | Bulldogs | 24 | 16 | 0 | 8 | 120 | 38 |
4 | Broncos | 24 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 172 | 36 |
5 | Sharks | 24 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 109 | 36 |
6 | Warriors | 24 | 14 | 0 | 10 | 21 | 34 |
7 | Panthers | 24 | 13 | 1 | 10 | 107 | 33 |
8 | Roosters | 24 | 13 | 0 | 11 | 132 | 32 |
9 | Dolphins | 24 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 125 | 30 |
10 | Sea Eagles | 24 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 21 | 30 |
11 | Eels | 24 | 10 | 0 | 14 | -76 | 26 |
12 | Cowboys | 24 | 9 | 1 | 14 | -146 | 25 |
13 | Tigers | 24 | 9 | 0 | 15 | -135 | 24 |
14 | Rabbitohs | 24 | 9 | 0 | 15 | -181 | 24 |
15 | Dragons | 24 | 8 | 0 | 16 | -130 | 22 |
16 | Titans | 24 | 6 | 0 | 18 | -199 | 18 |
17 | Knights | 24 | 6 | 0 | 18 | -300 | 18 |