Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
Garts said:Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
If some is continually charged with drink driving do you think they should be penalised more severely than a first time offender?
Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
The Eagle said:Garts said:Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
If some is continually charged with drink driving do you think they should be penalised more severely than a first time offender?
I thought common law said a man shouldn't have evidence from his previous similar offenses weighed against him with new charges
Volley said:Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
Hi Rex, Garts answered for me.
I think Matai would get the same charge, but loading would increase his punishment.
The Eagle said:Garts said:Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
If some is continually charged with drink driving do you think they should be penalised more severely than a first time offender?
I thought common law said a man shouldn't have evidence from his previous similar offenses weighed against him with new charges
As fro said, guilt from prior offences can't be used to prove guilt of a new charge, but it can be used in sentencing.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 | 7 | 1 | 56 | 16 | |
7 | 6 | 1 | 99 | 14 | |
8 | 6 | 2 | 66 | 14 | |
8 | 5 | 3 | 51 | 12 | |
9 | 5 | 3 | 37 | 11 | |
9 | 5 | 4 | 95 | 10 | |
9 | 5 | 4 | 42 | 10 | |
8 | 4 | 4 | 25 | 10 | |
9 | 5 | 4 | -14 | 10 | |
9 | 4 | 5 | -16 | 8 | |
8 | 3 | 5 | -55 | 8 | |
8 | 4 | 4 | -60 | 8 | |
8 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 7 | |
8 | 3 | 5 | -25 | 6 | |
8 | 2 | 6 | -63 | 6 | |
8 | 1 | 7 | -89 | 4 | |
8 | 1 | 7 | -166 | 4 |