That's the whole point Pete. I wasn't saying that we were discussing the same topic re Bears & Bankers, I was suggesting that your point of view above contradicts what you suggest your stance is elsewhere, and differs when you need evidence to support your own argument. Why is it ok for you to jokingly say that Bankers are percieved in a certain way, yet Wheel can't use satire when desribing a group to clarify his perception of Manly's culture? You attempt to utilise degradation to support your arguments, and I feel you are taking an easy out by suggesting you won't debate further topics with me.
You can't tell me you don't pigeon hole groups. By placing a person in a group, your perception would obviosly affect your attitude toward specific people.
Corso:-
"This site is not for the faint hearted, accept what is said and move on. I will not debate further topics with you."
That's weak dude. I would have hoped for more than this. But each to their own. I just feel you don't believe you can get the better of me in a debate - so you've jumped ship.