Aloiai Gone

SOURCE:

when copy + Paste is waaaaay to technical.....




Sea Eagles front-rower Josh Aloiai is reportedly facing medical retirement as the 29-year-old struggles to overcome an ongoing shoulder injury.

There are fears at Manly that Aloiai, who has made five appearances this season, may have played his last NRL game, according to The Daily Telegraph.

Aloiai returned from a seven-week lay off in Round 13 against the Broncos but lasted just 21 minutes before succumbing to injury.
 
SOURCE:

when copy + Paste is waaaaay to technical.....




Sea Eagles front-rower Josh Aloiai is reportedly facing medical retirement as the 29-year-old struggles to overcome an ongoing shoulder injury.

There are fears at Manly that Aloiai, who has made five appearances this season, may have played his last NRL game, according to The Daily Telegraph.

Aloiai returned from a seven-week lay off in Round 13 against the Broncos but lasted just 21 minutes before succumbing to injury.
If his shoulder problem goes back to at least 2023, and he signed his current deal in 2024... does pre-existing injury mean it won't be allowed as medical retirement for salary cap purposes? Hopefully this is not the case, we don't need any more salary cap disasters.
 
Not my favourite player but I do wish him all the best.

Not sure where the $1m in cap savings comes from. I thought Josh was on about $650k so that would go into our annual cap saving. Add in Sipley moving at about $400k plus the savings on DCE to Fogarty move and there is another $600k saving. I think we can safely assume Turbo retained and extended for a few more years but cut down to about $600k - 700k...so there's another say $600k savings on annual cap. That takes our total savings for next year at about $2.2m. Now the big question is Jake. Not sure I would be retaining him in the team but absolutely keeping him in the club. I think he would be absolutely invaluable as assistant coach and / or perhaps our defensive coach. Depending on what the club does here, we could add back his entire $950k into the cap (100%) or at worst (if retained in the team) re-sign him for 3 years at say $450. So at best we add $950 back into our cap or at worst $500k. That means we would have savings of somewhere between $2.7m - $3.3m. Apologies for all the numbers.

What the above means is we could legitimately go after a Payne Haas / NAS / Fifita. Really anyone we want.
 
The pre existing injury nonesense does not make sense. If a player suffers injury whilst playing NRL and can’t recover from that injury then he or she should be permitted to be medically retired regardless of the contract status. If player can’t play anymore isn’t the contract “frustrated” (legal term) and then open to termination in any event? With contracts getting longer the NRL needs to address this sensibly and not arbitrarily. If a player suffers an injury that potentially could affect him or her for the rest of their lives then they should have a choice the only sanction required is that they can’t have another contract registered with the NRL ever again.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Bulldogs 12 10 0 2 92 24
2 Raiders 14 11 0 3 96 22
3 Warriors 13 10 0 3 35 22
4 Storm 12 8 0 4 171 20
5 Sharks 13 7 0 6 14 16
6 Cowboys 12 5 1 6 -52 15
7 Dolphins 13 6 0 7 92 14
8 Broncos 13 6 0 7 44 14
9 Sea Eagles 13 6 0 7 42 14
10 Roosters 12 5 0 7 -22 14
11 Dragons 12 5 0 7 -47 14
12 Rabbitohs 13 6 0 7 -82 14
13 Panthers 13 5 1 7 -9 13
14 Tigers 13 5 0 8 -62 12
15 Knights 13 5 0 8 -65 12
16 Eels 13 4 0 9 -105 10
17 Titans 12 3 0 9 -142 10
Back
Top Bottom