Alberts possibly gets his chance TONIGHT

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by DVS Matt, Jun 3, 2005.



Share This Page

  1. DVS Matt

    By:DVS MattJun 3, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    14
    Likes Given:
    14
    Ratings:
    +34 /1
    The papers have Tezza at next to no chance of playing. Matai is suspended.

    They said that if Ash can overcome his niggling injuries he will play.

    I hope he does, and walks all over the top of Siola.
     
  2. byso

    By:bysoJun 3, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,616
    Likes Received:
    89
    Likes Given:
    101
    Ratings:
    +113 /0
    I agree. Hope he can play!
     
  3. Garts

    By:GartsJun 3, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,603
    Likes Received:
    394
    Likes Given:
    76
    Ratings:
    +947 /27
    someone said on ME the doctor did not clear him and Beaver into the centres.

    hope it is not true
     
  4. DVS Matt

    By:DVS MattJun 3, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    14
    Likes Given:
    14
    Ratings:
    +34 /1
    ahhh ok, i didn't see that.

    Beaver in the centres is NOT GOOD!

    Why weaken our strongest area of the field? Bring up a young guy in Taylor or even Mullane.

    OR push Hicks to centre and Creary to Wing, but please NO Beaver in centres
     
  5. CC_Eagle

    By:CC_EagleJun 3, 2005
    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Messages:
    695
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1 /0
    !pray: !pray: !pray:
     
  6. The Wheel

    By:The WheelJun 3, 2005
    Well-Known Member
    2018 Tipping Competitor

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    12,180
    Likes Received:
    1,571
    Likes Given:
    799
    Ratings:
    +5,032 /145
    Agree Hicks to centre is a far better option than Beaver, although I would like to see Ash get a chance.
     
  7. DVS Matt

    By:DVS MattJun 3, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    14
    Likes Given:
    14
    Ratings:
    +34 /1
    or Johnson.

    arrrrrgh, don't do this to me Des
     
  8. Garts

    By:GartsJun 3, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,603
    Likes Received:
    394
    Likes Given:
    76
    Ratings:
    +947 /27
    It does not surprise me putting Beaver in the centres.

    Still hoping Alberts is ok and runs out!!! hoping
     
  9. lasvegas

    By:lasvegasJun 3, 2005
    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    5
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +6 /0
    boys beaver defends a fair bit as a center anyway ,stewart is a good backrower and will fill the void.i agree i would like to see alberts as well but if not give me beaver anyday over the other ****.he also takes his hitups wider of the ruck as well.
     
  10. DVS Matt

    By:DVS MattJun 3, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    14
    Likes Given:
    14
    Ratings:
    +34 /1
    answer me this, why weaken 1 area to strengthen another?

    we have become dominant this year because of our back-row.

    our centres have been one of the worst pairings around and yet we are still coming 2nd, so imo it won't hurt us to put a young specialist centre in there.
     
  11. Kiwi Eagle

    By:Kiwi EagleJun 3, 2005
    Moderator
    Staff Member 2018 Tipping Competitor

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    15,560
    Likes Received:
    2,221
    Likes Given:
    298
    Ratings:
    +5,185 /84
    I was cracking a fat at the thought of Alberts playing,but that was quickly deflated with the mention of Menzies in the centres !
     
  12. lasvegas

    By:lasvegasJun 3, 2005
    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    5
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +6 /0
    because it wont matter squat how good we are up the middle if everytime they ping it wide they carve us up.i agree give me alberts if fit but if hes not and you run out with mullane or someone its over.hicks would be good in the centres but the wingers like creary and so on are crap .the people in charge have got us this far so obviously their opinions of the alternatives arent that high,have faith boys
     
  13. Ryan

    By:RyanJun 3, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    17,730
    Likes Received:
    4,415
    Likes Given:
    728
    Ratings:
    +13,036 /582
    1. Brett Stewart
    2. Scott Donald
    3. Ashley Alberts
    4. Paul Stephenson
    5. Chris Hicks
    6. Michael Witt
    7. Michael Monaghan
    8. Brent Kite
    9. Luke Williamson
    10.Sam Harris
    11.Anthony Watmough
    12.Steve Menzies
    13.Ben Kennedy

    14.Shayne Dunley
    15.Jason King
    16.Mark Bryant
    17.Glenn Stewart
     
  14. PEPSI

    By:PEPSIJun 3, 2005
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,578
    Likes Received:
    1
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2 /0
    our centres dont play a traditional centre type game anyway. ( as in free flowing, running into created gaps etc ) so having Beaver there wont be a major issue, he attacks out there anyway, we will miss his defence in the middle but we know Glenn Stewart can tackjle.

    so mayby that would not be a major issue ???? just a thought.

    But as a rule, im with DVS Matt, never strengthen one position to weaken another.
     
  15. lasvegas

    By:lasvegasJun 3, 2005
    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    5
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +6 /0
    pepsi i agree totally not to move backrowers out there but management know a lot more than we do about the ability of replacements so i will put my trust in their judgement in this case.i was only saying to sue yesterday i wish alberts would get a gig so i am not against that.
     
  16. ChuckWood

    By:ChuckWoodJun 3, 2005
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    463
    Likes Received:
    4
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4 /0
    Sam Harris in the centres wouldn't be a bad move.
    He wouldn't be any slower than Hill & his defence is fairly good. ( just a thought )
     
  17. Garts

    By:GartsJun 3, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,603
    Likes Received:
    394
    Likes Given:
    76
    Ratings:
    +947 /27
    I do agree but we dont have a specialist centre available besides Johnson and he is not ready for 1st grade. Taylor is a winger/fullback and Mullane is a 5/8 who plays a bit of centre. If Alberts is out I believe Beaver is the best choice. By adding Stewart in 2nd row we get a real workhorse.
     
  18. lasvegas

    By:lasvegasJun 3, 2005
    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    5
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +6 /0
    i think we keep that for what it is , a thought
     
  19. Garts

    By:GartsJun 3, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,603
    Likes Received:
    394
    Likes Given:
    76
    Ratings:
    +947 /27
    i think we keep that for what it is , a thought
    [/quote]

    when I think of Sam Harris in the centres I think of the Waratahs 2002, Christchurch.
     
  20. CC_Eagle

    By:CC_EagleJun 3, 2005
    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Messages:
    695
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1 /0
    Agreed.

    Taylor,Johnson or even Mullane would be able to do the job.

    Just don't destroy our backrow Des!!!
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
Top