Alberts possibly gets his chance TONIGHT

Bencher
The papers have Tezza at next to no chance of playing. Matai is suspended.

They said that if Ash can overcome his niggling injuries he will play.

I hope he does, and walks all over the top of Siola.
 
First Grader
someone said on ME the doctor did not clear him and Beaver into the centres.

hope it is not true
 
Bencher
ahhh ok, i didn't see that.

Beaver in the centres is NOT GOOD!

Why weaken our strongest area of the field? Bring up a young guy in Taylor or even Mullane.

OR push Hicks to centre and Creary to Wing, but please NO Beaver in centres
 
https://membership.seaeagles.com.au/
Premium Member
Agree Hicks to centre is a far better option than Beaver, although I would like to see Ash get a chance.
 
First Grader
It does not surprise me putting Beaver in the centres.

Still hoping Alberts is ok and runs out!!! hoping
 
Reserve Grader
boys beaver defends a fair bit as a center anyway ,stewart is a good backrower and will fill the void.i agree i would like to see alberts as well but if not give me beaver anyday over the other ****.he also takes his hitups wider of the ruck as well.
 
Bencher
answer me this, why weaken 1 area to strengthen another?

we have become dominant this year because of our back-row.

our centres have been one of the worst pairings around and yet we are still coming 2nd, so imo it won't hurt us to put a young specialist centre in there.
 
Moderator
Staff member
I was cracking a fat at the thought of Alberts playing,but that was quickly deflated with the mention of Menzies in the centres !
 
Reserve Grader
because it wont matter squat how good we are up the middle if everytime they ping it wide they carve us up.i agree give me alberts if fit but if hes not and you run out with mullane or someone its over.hicks would be good in the centres but the wingers like creary and so on are crap .the people in charge have got us this far so obviously their opinions of the alternatives arent that high,have faith boys
 
Journey Man
1. Brett Stewart
2. Scott Donald
3. Ashley Alberts
4. Paul Stephenson
5. Chris Hicks
6. Michael Witt
7. Michael Monaghan
8. Brent Kite
9. Luke Williamson
10.Sam Harris
11.Anthony Watmough
12.Steve Menzies
13.Ben Kennedy

14.Shayne Dunley
15.Jason King
16.Mark Bryant
17.Glenn Stewart
 
Bencher
our centres dont play a traditional centre type game anyway. ( as in free flowing, running into created gaps etc ) so having Beaver there wont be a major issue, he attacks out there anyway, we will miss his defence in the middle but we know Glenn Stewart can tackjle.

so mayby that would not be a major issue ???? just a thought.

But as a rule, im with DVS Matt, never strengthen one position to weaken another.
 
Reserve Grader
pepsi i agree totally not to move backrowers out there but management know a lot more than we do about the ability of replacements so i will put my trust in their judgement in this case.i was only saying to sue yesterday i wish alberts would get a gig so i am not against that.
 
Reserve Grader
Sam Harris in the centres wouldn't be a bad move.
He wouldn't be any slower than Hill & his defence is fairly good. ( just a thought )
 
First Grader
answer me this, why weaken 1 area to strengthen another?

we have become dominant this year because of our back-row.

our centres have been one of the worst pairings around and yet we are still coming 2nd, so imo it won't hurt us to put a young specialist centre in there.

I do agree but we dont have a specialist centre available besides Johnson and he is not ready for 1st grade. Taylor is a winger/fullback and Mullane is a 5/8 who plays a bit of centre. If Alberts is out I believe Beaver is the best choice. By adding Stewart in 2nd row we get a real workhorse.
 
Reserve Grader
Sam Harris in the centres wouldn't be a bad move.
He wouldn't be any slower than Hill & his defence is fairly good. ( just a thought )

i think we keep that for what it is , a thought
 
First Grader
[quote author=ChuckWood]
Sam Harris in the centres wouldn't be a bad move.
He wouldn't be any slower than Hill & his defence is fairly good. ( just a thought )

i think we keep that for what it is , a thought
[/quote]

when I think of Sam Harris in the centres I think of the Waratahs 2002, Christchurch.
 
Reserve Grader
answer me this, why weaken 1 area to strengthen another?

we have become dominant this year because of our back-row.

our centres have been one of the worst pairings around and yet we are still coming 2nd, so imo it won't hurt us to put a young specialist centre in there.

Agreed.

Taylor,Johnson or even Mullane would be able to do the job.

Just don't destroy our backrow Des!!!
 

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
24 20 4 306 42
24 18 6 209 38
24 17 7 272 36
24 16 8 119 34
24 15 9 247 32
24 15 9 201 32
24 14 10 130 30
24 14 10 63 30
24 13 11 -36 28
24 12 12 -100 26
24 9 15 -105 20
24 7 17 -192 16
24 6 18 -205 14
24 6 18 -290 14
24 6 18 -292 14
24 4 20 -327 10
Top Bottom