Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

2nd test

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,156
Reaction score
7,850
Australia 0/86 at lunch

Langer 51, Hayden 32.

another solid start, who knows what they could score
 

Dan

Kim Jong Dan
Staff member
Administrator
2018 Tipping Competitor
2019 Tipping Competitor
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
35,798
Reaction score
11,634
i have to get me a mini tv for work
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,156
Reaction score
7,850
i listen on the radio

Hayden out for 70, caught and bowled.

Aus now 1/137
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,156
Reaction score
7,850
Stumps day 1

Aus 3/327, langer 144, lehamn 28.

mertyn has no pressure on his spot so will do poorly as is always the way
 

byso

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
9,622
Reaction score
128
Very true Mark Waugh went that way for years
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,156
Reaction score
7,850
Aussies have bored NZ to sleep and finally declared 15 mins after lunch.

NZ need 464 from the 4 innings.

The aussies run rate was 2.7 or less - very slow for them
 

byso

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
9,622
Reaction score
128
Maybe the batsman were playing for averages!
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,156
Reaction score
7,850
Martyn needs to, thats for sure

the only player with a lower average in the aussie team is Kaspa.

Martyn is 10th in averages.

I told people he wouldnt do well now his place is not on the line
 

Canteen Worker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
13,242
Reaction score
214
Fair go Fluffy. Martyn was the star batsman of the India series and basically won us that very hard set of matches.

What does he have to do?
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,156
Reaction score
7,850
Every other batsman will play good for extended periods - martyn is a series here - a game there. He wasnt that far ahead of Katich who was dropped. Martyn should be let go for some younger talent.

He has has is best calender year by a mile and isnt that far ahead of anyone.
 

The Wheel

https://membership.seaeagles.com.au/
Premium Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
16,275
Reaction score
15,745
The worse player in this regard was Michael Slater - he always scored a century in the first test of a series then you wouldn't see him again until the next series. Kiwis are 4-44 after lunch
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,156
Reaction score
7,850
Martyn went longer than that.

consider he last few years

2003 - 7th highest scorer - 0 centuries

2002 - 5th highest scorer - 2 centuries

2001 - 7th highest scorer - 3 centuries

49 matches - 9 centuries, 4 of which were this year, so at 38 matched he had 5 centuries. He did not deserve his place.

These are hardly the stats of a great player worthy of being in the team this year over katich/maher.

Slats performed a lot more often.
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,156
Reaction score
7,850
Its all over

Aussies win by 313.

All 5 bowlers bagged 2 in the last innings - a terrific team performance.

Langer Man of the match

McGrath man of the series
 

Volley

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
4,284
Reaction score
1,517
Martyn is alot better than Lehmann. Lehmann is one of the ugliest batsmen to ever play the game. He used to be good, now he sucks. Bring back Katich.
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,156
Reaction score
7,850
All about the looks huh.

lol, i dont bat that way.

I think katich should be there before both of them, however i think martyn should have been dropped last year when he failed repeatedly. I dont rate lehman that highly either - next to get the chop and would prefer to see another younger player in as our team is ageing.
 

Volley

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
4,284
Reaction score
1,517
Langer's bloody average to watch, but he deserves his place in the team. So it's not all about the looks. That being said i would rather watch Slater and Mark Waugh get 20 than Langer or Hayden get 100.

I couldn't believe Lehmann got 81 in Adelaide, he batted like sh!t. All the commentators said it was a great knock, but when Warne gets 53 you know it's a road. Lehmann is not as good as he used to be, now he is average and nowhere near as good as Katich.
 

Canteen Worker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
13,242
Reaction score
214
Interesting you say that because statistically Langer is a quicker scorer than both Mark Waugh and Hayden. I didn't believe it but the ABC commentators passed on the info on Sunday during the broadcast.

Lehmann is average and it is time for him to go. His wickets were a help in the second innings but Clarke is better and Katich is an underrated bowler as well!
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,156
Reaction score
7,850
Langer deserves his spot. His average is a bit lower than others because he doesnt get many not outs. Also when he fires he converts to a big score and set the team up for a win. He has 20 centries to his name now.
 

Canteen Worker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
13,242
Reaction score
214
Aussies have three players, all who have scored 20 centuries: Langer, Hayden and Ponting. Has never happened in the history of test cricket. Add Martyn with 12 (ish) Clarke with 2, Lehmann with 6, and Gilly with 13 (I think)) that is not far off 100 centuries for the top six.

Funnily enough 10 Aussies scored 50s against the Kiwis with only Kaspar to miss out!
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,156
Reaction score
7,850
MArtyn has 9, 4 of which were scored this year.
 

Latest posts

2020 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Panthers 20 18 1 1 299 37
2 Storm 20 16 0 4 258 32
3 Eels 20 15 0 5 104 30
4 Roosters 20 14 0 6 230 28
5 Raiders 20 14 0 6 128 28
6 Rabbitohs 20 12 0 8 169 24
7 Knights 20 11 1 8 47 23
8 Sharks 20 10 0 10 0 20
9 Titans 20 9 0 11 -117 18
10 Warriors 20 8 0 12 -115 16
11 Tigers 20 7 0 13 -65 14
12 Dragons 20 7 0 13 -74 14
13 Sea Eagles 20 7 0 13 -134 14
14 Cowboys 20 5 0 15 -152 10
15 Bulldogs 20 3 0 17 -222 6
16 Broncos 20 3 0 17 -356 6
Top Bottom