20 minutes

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
  • We have been getting regular requests for users who have been locked out of their accounts because they have changed email adresses over the lifetime of their accounts. Please make sure the email address under your account is your current and correct email address in order to avoid this in the future. You can set your email address at https://silvertails.net/account/account-details
  • Wwe are currently experience some server issues which I am working through and hoping to resolve soon, Please bare with me whilst I work through making some changes and possible intermittent outages.
  • Apologies all our server was runing rogue. I managed to get us back to a point from 2:45 today though there is an attachment issue i will fix shortly. Things should be smooth now though

ads

Bencher
We should play Orford off the bench, as he only can be bothered trying for 20 minutes.

All the Monas, Burns knockers - as least they try the whole whole game. Orford doesn't talk, he doesn't try.

Why the hell is it when Manly pays big bucks for half backs they suck.
 

Fluffy

Journey Man
Something needs to be done.

I was never for the drop him to PL option but after today it has entered my mind as a viable alternative
 

Nutzcraw

Bencher
Do this...


Have a look at Manly's halves combination for the last 4 years... I'm sure you'll find we had more points in us and a better winning percentage with Monaghan/Burns as our halves then any other combination.
 

fLIP

UFO Hunter
Do this...


Have a look at Manly's halves combination for the last 4 years... I'm sure you'll find we had more points in us and a better winning percentage with Monaghan/Burns as our halves then any other combination.

And i'm also sure we were sitting 2nd after nearly 2/3 of the season?
 

Nutzcraw

Bencher
[quote author=Nutzcraw]
Do this...


Have a look at Manly's halves combination for the last 4 years... I'm sure you'll find we had more points in us and a better winning percentage with Monaghan/Burns as our halves then any other combination.

And i'm also sure we were sitting 2nd after nearly 2/3 of the season?
[/quote]

Ok genius,

What combination has got us to 2nd??
 

fLIP

UFO Hunter
What combination has got us to 2nd??

In each of Manly's game this season, there have been 4 different combinations used.

Those being:

Orford + Lyon
Orford + Burns
Monaghan + Burns
Orford + Monaghan

Of these combinations the following number of games have been won:

Orford + Lyon - 5 Wins / 7 Games
Monaghan + Burns - 4 Wins / 4 Games
Orford + Burns - 2 Wins / 3 Games
Orford + Monaghan 0 Wins / 1 Game

Of each member of the 3 winning halves combinations:

Orford - 7 Wins / 11 Games
Burns - 6 Wins / 7 Games
Lyon - 5 Wins / 7 Games
Monaghan - 4 Wins / 5 Games
 

Nutzcraw

Bencher
Where'd you get the stats from, flip?

I wanna check something and if my womans intuition is correct I'll post the findings.

:lol: and 8|
 

fLIP

UFO Hunter
Also, you better fess up your womanly thoughts so I can rub it in when you are wrong ;)
 

Nutzcraw

Bencher
I already stated it.. that I think we have a better FOR when monas/burns are our halves and a better winning percentage than any other combo we have had in recent years.
 

fLIP

UFO Hunter
Yeah, the problem with that, and the stats I provide is that they aren't quite comparible.

What I mean is you can look at Moanghan as say he has won 4 from 5 games this year in the halves and then look at orford and say he only won 7 from 11.

The problem arrises from Moanghan not having the same number of games and therefore reducing his chances of failure.

The same goes for points f/a with combos.

You can't compare a havles combo from 4 games to that of any other combo more than that many game accurately.
 

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
14 11 3 103 26
14 10 4 118 24
14 10 4 78 24
15 9 6 161 20
14 8 6 60 20
14 7 7 63 18
14 7 7 37 18
15 8 7 -8 18
14 7 7 -50 18
13 7 6 -55 18
15 7 7 28 17
14 6 8 -55 16
15 6 8 -47 15
14 5 9 -112 14
14 4 10 -71 12
14 4 10 -121 12
13 3 10 -129 10
Back
Top Bottom