Nice try chump but if you bother to read my posts you will notice that i stated that i am against the death penalty
[quote author=Daniel]. Whilst the % of death may therefore be lower, I find it a lot more a problem that you would rather fight for the death of a drug courier rather than admit speeding is far more dangerous and likely to kill YOU than heroin
So you are saying i am correct - I was arguing the risk/occurance fits the crime, now you agree with the backing of my arguement. Nice turn around.
So here i am argueing with someone that wishes to see a convicted drug trafficer have a minutes silence and a public holiday named after him.
Come celebrate Van day at Dan's. Dan will be supplying every drug of choice bar one (no speed allowed).
Whilst high dont you dare drive fast or its the death penalty for you.
[/quote]
No Fluffy you quite cleary have not read all the posts I have placed in this post!
- I do not support Van nguyen
- I do not think he is a martyr
- I do not agree with a minutes silence for him
- I do not support drug trafficekrs, users or makers.
-
BUT...
I do not support the death penalty under any situation
And no i am not agreeing with you at all. I do not think that teh death penalty fits the crime at all. The percentage is only lower because you have to take into account the amount of people on the roads. But you need to then compare them to the amount that are actually exposed to speeding.
Why use inuendos when you have not even tried to read all my posts?