I can understand why that try of Williams was not a penalty try. What I can't understand is why, after the try was awarded and the conversion attempted, we didn't get a further penalty where the illegal play on Robbo was performed. it would appear that that illegal play came with no consequences at the time. Therefore if a try is awarded, any illegal act leading up to it is just let slide unless it is on the tryscorer. If the transgressor is punished later through the week, the team playing against them benefits but we don't any at the time at all. Get my drift. We should have got a penalty awarded where Robbo was upended imo.