No bounce plus no separation equals a TRY

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
  • We have been getting regular requests for users who have been locked out of their accounts because they have changed email adresses over the lifetime of their accounts. Please make sure the email address under your account is your current and correct email address in order to avoid this in the future. You can set your email address at https://silvertails.net/account/account-details
I think Jorge scored a fair try.

Reasoning is he had control of the ball to start with and was in the process of losing control but had not lost control yet. At what point does one lose control is the question?

For those saying no try what would have been the ruling? No try knock on (even though there was no knock on before hitting the ground)?

If the had been an offload he still would have had enough control to get the ball away just not full control to hit the recipient on the chest.

Where the application of the rule went wrong was when players were regathering kicks and not getting full control before grounding.
 
Why do they look at incidents in slow motion?
All replays should be in real speed. It's how we all watch things. If it looks like a try in real speed it is a try.
When you slow it down frame by frame there is almost always separation as a player touches the ball down.
In real time this looked like a try. In slow-mo it doesn't. But the on-field ref ruled a try which, at normal speed, it was.
 
Team P W L PD Pts
7 6 1 99 14
8 6 2 66 14
7 6 1 54 14
9 5 3 37 11
9 5 4 95 10
7 4 3 49 10
9 5 4 42 10
9 5 4 -14 10
7 3 4 17 8
8 4 4 -14 8
8 3 5 -55 8
8 4 4 -60 8
8 3 4 17 7
8 3 5 -25 6
7 2 5 -55 6
7 1 6 -87 4
8 1 7 -166 4
Back
Top Bottom