Canteen, I've heard all that stuff about being role models and thinking of the sponsorship dollar. Â Putting it into contracts and then putting on sessions where drinking is encouraged just doesn't do it for me. Â And the NRL are guilty of staging these events, plus clubs, plus coaches, plus sponsors. Â The temptation to drink must be extremely strong for these youngsters and inserting a clause in their contracts seems to me to be purile really. Â Funnily enough one of the biggest sponsors is the alcohol industry, ciggies used to be. Â The hierarchy of the game, if they were serious about their image, would work overtime on not providing this issue with air. Â Gallop has been the one to give this issue air time with his hypocritical stand for all to see. Â The issue of public opinion polls being the arbitrator of behaviour and taste is also questionable. Â When one relies on pollsters to set your parameters of behaviour you really should look at the questions in the poll and the bias of the questioners and surely the people who participate. Â Were they representative of the population? What were the questions asked? Who commissioned the poll and what were the outcomes they wanted? Â To say the 75% of people wanted Brett suspended could be based on a survey of four members of Family First. Â I for one don't think anyone should just lie down and get run over by the media and cop anything that comes their way. Â I'm pleased that Brett is hopefully challenging his suspension. Â That is his right and polls/Gallop/sponsors should not have any input into his decision. Â League is a working man's game and will survive this and any other so called 'scandals' that the press want to dig up. Â I think, perhaps wrongly, that everyone has a right to privacy. Â It's a shame that this right is being eroded. Â Â Â Â Â