Idris tackle replicates Matai (v Souths)

Duff said:
Have people gone mad?
How can that even be contemplated as being high?

So you're just not allowed to put a hit on a Souffs or Bongos or any of the other protected species players at all. I wish the NRL would come out and list just who is in that category. Definitely those two entire teams. Are there individuals from other clubs or is it done purely on a club by club basis?

I was talking with a neighbour yesterday and we came up with this quote.

"If you aren't wearing maroon and white you're always in the right."

I've mentioned the 'angry vision' referees appear to have when watching Manly games. And I've alluded to the possibility of subconscious decision-making with refs growing up supporting say Parramatta and obviously hating Manly. Then they get their chance to referee Manly that must have a bearing on their decisions and the penalties they give or don't give.
 
eagle-rock08 said:
Duff said:
Have people gone mad?
How can that even be contemplated as being high?

So you're just not allowed to put a hit on a Souffs or Bongos or any of the other protected species players at all. I wish the NRL would come out and list just who is in that category. Definitely those two entire teams. Are there individuals from other clubs or is it done purely on a club by club basis?

I was talking with a neighbour yesterday and we came up with this quote.

"If you aren't wearing maroon and white you're always in the right."

I've mentioned the 'angry vision' referees appear to have when watching Manly games. And I've alluded to the possibility of subconscious decision-making with refs growing up supporting say Parramatta and obviously hating Manly. Then they get their chance to referee Manly that must have a bearing on their decisions and the penalties they give or don't give.

Refs don't grow up being a fan of any rugby leauge team. How else could they be so happy to destroy a great game. More than a penalty every 4 minutes is just bad to watch. Probably makes it fun to ref and be the man.
 
I get why they changed the shoulder charge rule, but the definition of the shoulder charge is ambiguous. They would have been better increasing the penalty for a shoulder charge gone wrong.
 
Spuds Bodyguard said:
I get why they changed the shoulder charge rule, but the definition of the shoulder charge is ambiguous. They would have been better increasing the penalty for a shoulder charge gone wrong.

way too sensible and not open enough to rubbish interpretations when it takes their fancy - this is why you are not an nrl ref or judiciary member
 
So Idris rightfully not cited.

What annoys me is that every hard hit is almost always now guaranteed to be a penalty. But when the review panel on Monday do nothing as the tackle was legal what happens to the referee? Nothing. So what we will see is coaches telling players not to tackle hard as we don't want to get penalised. RL is fast becoming unwatchable drivel.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 17 14 0 3 108 30
2 Storm 15 11 0 4 202 28
3 Bulldogs 15 11 0 4 92 28
4 Warriors 15 10 0 5 11 26
5 Broncos 16 9 0 7 68 22
6 Panthers 15 7 1 7 3 21
7 Dolphins 16 8 0 8 162 20
8 Sea Eagles 16 8 0 8 58 20
9 Roosters 15 7 0 8 14 20
10 Sharks 16 8 0 8 -4 20
11 Dragons 15 6 0 9 -49 18
12 Cowboys 16 6 1 9 -140 17
13 Knights 16 6 0 10 -67 16
14 Tigers 16 6 0 10 -82 16
15 Eels 15 5 0 10 -103 16
16 Rabbitohs 17 6 0 11 -129 14
17 Titans 15 4 0 11 -144 14
Back
Top Bottom