1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Harrigan - please explain

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by silvertail, May 21, 2012.

  1. silvertail

    silvertail Well-Known Member

    786
    314
    Ratings:
    +398 / 6
    NRL referees' boss Bill Harrigan admitted on Monday a video refereeing blunder cost the Sydney Roosters a legitimate try in their 18-10 loss to Manly, but the tryscorer himself believes it didn't decide the game.

    With Manly leading 16-10 at Brookvale Oval on Sunday, Roosters halfback Daniel Mortimer crossed under the posts for a potentially match-levelling try but was cruelly denied by video referee Pat Reynolds moments later.

    Reynolds ruled that Roosters second-rower Brad Takairangi, who was placed on report, had used his elbow in a dangerous manner against Manly's Daniel Harrison when attempting the offload which led to Mortimer's try.

    But Harrigan admits the video referee erred in hitting the red button and that the Roosters should have been awarded the crucial try.

    "The video referee got this call wrong," Harrigan said on NRL.com

    "It should have been ruled a try to the Roosters.

    "The video referee believed that there was a raised elbow from the ball carrier in the lead-up to Daniel Mortimer crossing the line, but he got the decision wrong."

     
     
  2. Canteen Worker

    Canteen Worker Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    13,234
    186
    Ratings:
    +212 / 5
    So forwards are now allowed to lead with the elbow and take opposing players out??
     
  3. dceagle

    dceagle Active Member

    459
    50
    Ratings:
    +50 / 0
    Harrigan has been a Rooster Booster for many years now
     
  4. silvertail

    silvertail Well-Known Member

    786
    314
    Ratings:
    +398 / 6
    Cannot believe that Harrigan came out with these statements.
     
  5. SP_Eagle

    SP_Eagle Member

    79
    12
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0
    Gotta love how he gives no explanation as to why.... What Bob Fulton said about this goose is right !
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. silvertail

    silvertail Well-Known Member

    786
    314
    Ratings:
    +398 / 6
    The club should seek an explanation from him.
     
  7. KOMORI

    KOMORI Born and bred an Eagle

    3,702
    1,054
    Brisbane
    Ratings:
    +3,269 / 53
    What_game_did_Hollywood_watch????

    Goose.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. bones

    bones Bones Knows Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    8,367
    5,100
    Ratings:
    +8,999 / 102
    I thought it was a try as well.
     
  9. manlywarringah

    manlywarringah Well-Known Member Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    780
    289
    Ratings:
    +885 / 27
    You can't put your elbow into someone's jaw and get away with it.

    If that was done on the 50 metre line, it would've been a penalty and the guy put on report.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. bones

    bones Bones Knows Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    8,367
    5,100
    Ratings:
    +8,999 / 102
    It happens plenty of times every match and nothing is done.
     
  11. Garts

    Garts Well-Known Member

    5,482
    363
    Ratings:
    +672 / 18
    Braith was right and so is Harrigan, should have been a try. If the shoe was on the other foot you would be screaming blue murder.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. dowdz

    dowdz Well-Known Member Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    2,780
    681
    Ratings:
    +853 / 5
    Should have never gotten to a video ref if the officials picked up the forward pass in the build up. Square up I reckon. Also, anyone hear the ref call held on the Roosters line, when they dropped the ball and one of our players dived over the line?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Jono

    Jono Well-Known Member

    1,419
    175
    Ratings:
    +176 / 5
    However, what about the blatant knock on after the short kickoff? The Roosters knocked that ball on and it was overlooked. In addition, players were off side all game on both sides. The refereeing was horrible all game.[hr]
    However, what about the blatant knock on after the short kickoff? The Roosters knocked that ball on and it was overlooked. In addition, players were off side all game on both sides. The refereeing was horrible all game.[hr]
    However, what about the blatant knock on after the short kickoff? The Roosters knocked that ball on and it was overlooked. In addition, players were off side all game on both sides. The refereeing was horrible all game.
     
  14. globaleagle

    globaleagle Où est mon chapeau Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    11,778
    4,704
    Ratings:
    +7,783 / 58
    jono, what are you trying to say to say to say?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. Ian Martin tragic

    Ian Martin tragic Well-Known Member

    981
    121
    Ratings:
    +137 / 0
    jono: I say everything thrice.

    I think the roosters were dudded on that one, even if it was technically correct. If the refs had spotted it they should have blown the whistle and stopped the play right there.

    But what about the decision to have the roosters play the ball after their player was being railroaded over their tryline and he loses it!

    And when they restarted play incorrectly and were told to go back and do it again.

    It was like a childcare centre out there. Mean while the players were trying to tear each other to shreds.

    Maybe the refs had better change from that pink colour; seems to be getting to them a bit.
     
  16. eagles2win

    eagles2win Well-Known Member

    4,963
    494
    Ratings:
    +494 / 0
    It should have been a try.

    Here's another Friend kept tapping the ball a) off the mark or b) when he hadnt been given a mark - under the rules that constitutes a scrum.
    All the comentators on fox picked it up
     
  17. Ralphie

    Ralphie Well-Known Member Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    3,648
    489
    Bredbo
    Ratings:
    +2,093 / 231
    If the shoe was on the other foot and let's say it was Matai with the raised arm the result would have been no try and a 3 week suspension.
     
  18. lismore_fan

    lismore_fan Well-Known Member

    1,071
    158
    Lismore
    Ratings:
    +206 / 1
    Anasta cries to the ref, "I've been playing a long time and this happens... welll... pause..pause... a million times!"
     
  19. Stevo

    Stevo Well-Known Member

    4,566
    995
    NSW
    Ratings:
    +1,319 / 47
    I fail to see how the video ref got it wrong. The on field referee asked him to check for a raised elbow. He saw a raised elbow. I know this cause i saw a raised elbow. Is Harrigan arguing that there was no raised elbow or that it shouldn't have been refered?
     
  20. bones

    bones Bones Knows Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    8,367
    5,100
    Ratings:
    +8,999 / 102
    They should have awarded the try and just let the match review committee decide whether or not to take it further.
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page