So you don't see your utter hypocrisy then Woodsie? Oh dear.
You (incorrectly) perceived one part of one posting of mine, when taken totally out of context, sought to shut down Ralphie's right to free speech. And in response you spend 5 weeks, and innumerable abusive and repetitive postings, seeking to shut down mine?
Here is the link and entire posting (posting 35):
http://silvertails.net/threads/the-...f-his-sons-gay-union.48675/page-2#post-779064
It's is soooo basic having to explain this to you again Woodsie. If you take off your emotive drama queen hat, and put on your thinking cap, you'll notice three elements in my challenge to Ralphie:
1. A challenge to explain ANY harm coming from two same-sex people loving each other. Ralphie couldn't articulate any harm at all. Neither could you. Neither could anyone else.
2. An assertion that if people's behaviour doesn't cause harm, then it is none of your business to moralise about it.
3. If you choose to moralise about people's behaviour that does not cause harm, then you are acting as if you are God.
Let me be explicit because you have clear trouble comprehending this. I did not seek to stop Ralphie expressing his view. I challenged the premise of his view, and highlighted the implications of it. Including the implication that he was acting as if he had direct access to the mind of God.
That you obsessed so vehemently defending Ralphie suggests that you are in exactly the same bucket as Ralphie. And that you NEED to judge (ie moralise) about other people, and feel offended and extremely activated when someone challenges you on that.