Good problem to have, seems we always have on back injured but my guess it would be between Hoppa and Talau. However if Saab doesn’t improve his mistake/missed tackle rate he could be the oneNot sure where ppl have young Hoppa, but I reckon the perfect combination of class and skill and a Must to be in top grade from day 1 in 2025.
I reckon outside Talau who was super in 2024, Hoppa was our best outside back.
Where do we fit him in and if so, who misses out ?
What's your thoughts tho WheelGood problem to have, seems we always have on back injured but my guess it would be between Hoppa and Talau. However if Saab doesn’t improve his mistake/missed tackle rate he could be the one
2nd highest points in a season ever. Rubs is a good winger, but not our best centre.Hoppa 100% must start next year in the 17, initially on the wing. Beware 2nd year syndrome though.
As much as I like him, Garrick misses out.....mainly because of the insistence to play in the centres (either by him, or the coach)....I still maintain we are weakening 2 positions with this stance.
Tommy Talau back to centre.
DCE to goalkick .
If Garrick would simply revert to the wing, its a different discussion.
This was Garrick's first year playing in the centres since 2018. Given he has a representative jersey at centre now, and we made the 8, I think everyone is just looking for an excuse for team-wide issues, and the whipping boy without Parker, Harper, Schuster, etc, becomes Garrick. He will improve, like he always has, at wing, fullback, and now centre.
It's all about opinion mate and I respect yours 100%This will upset people here, but the guy is at Manly until at least 2026, and from something Seibs said, he might be signed until 2027. He was monstered by the Dogs and Roosters in the finals, whereas Talau had great games. There's no rush to give him a starting 17 spot. He should grow into his own body, and grow his own game, and not be shunted out, when there is a person there already (Talau).
For the sake of consistency, and Hopoate's own development, as playing him at fullback in NSW cup will develop and prepare him and the team better for a Turbo injury, Talau should be getting the starting wing spot. Garrick and Koula should be the centres, and if that is changed, it should be a move for getting Koula into games.
This was Garrick's first year playing in the centres since 2018. Given he has a representative jersey at centre now, and we made the 8, I think everyone is just looking for an excuse for team-wide issues, and the whipping boy without Parker, Harper, Schuster, etc, becomes Garrick. He will improve, like he always has, at wing, fullback, and now centre.
I would start the year Turbo, Garrick, Talau, Tolu, Saab.What's your thoughts tho Wheel
Always like your opinion- would you find a place for Hoppa in the 17 ?
That's 100% fair mateI would start the year Turbo, Garrick, Talau, Tolu, Saab.
Lehi will get his chance and play plenty of games. Need to be careful of 2nd year syndrome, it will be a long season if he goes in first up.
But when he gets in he will probably stay in.
Don't think this will upset people.This will upset people here, but the guy is at Manly until at least 2026, and from something Seibs said, he might be signed until 2027. He was monstered by the Dogs and Roosters in the finals, whereas Talau had great games. There's no rush to give him a starting 17 spot. He should grow into his own body, and grow his own game, and not be shunted out, when there is a person there already (Talau).
For the sake of consistency, and Hopoate's own development, as playing him at fullback in NSW cup will develop and prepare him and the team better for a Turbo injury, Talau should be getting the starting wing spot. Garrick and Koula should be the centres, and if that is changed, it should be a move for getting Koula into games.
This was Garrick's first year playing in the centres since 2018. Given he has a representative jersey at centre now, and we made the 8, I think everyone is just looking for an excuse for team-wide issues, and the whipping boy without Parker, Harper, Schuster, etc, becomes Garrick. He will improve, like he always has, at wing, fullback, and now centre.
Hoppa is a generational player, you find ways to have players of this ability in your team, he would play left wing and continue to build his first grade career.Not sure where ppl have young Hoppa, but I reckon the perfect combination of class and skill and a Must to be in top grade from day 1 in 2025.
I reckon outside Talau who was super in 2024, Hoppa was our best outside back.
Where do we fit him in and if so, who misses out ?
As always - makes sense DionHoppa is a generational player, you find ways to have players of this ability in your team, he would play left wing and continue to build his first grade career.
The same way Turbo developed while Snake was in the 1 jumper, you just find a way to have him in the starting 13, it means making a tough call on another player then that’s what it’s got to be, I would have him over Saab and Garrick on form.
It’s a moralHoppa will start at fullback if TT suffers a shoulder/ pec / hammy/ ankle injury playing for Australia
Hope he doesn’t but ……..
I found this article on when the club resigned Garrick after the rainbow jumper fiasco.Hoppa 100% must start next year in the 17, initially on the wing. Beware 2nd year syndrome though.
As much as I like him, Garrick misses out.....mainly because of the insistence to play in the centres (either by him, or the coach)....I still maintain we are weakening 2 positions with this stance.
Tommy Talau back to centre.
DCE to goalkick .
If Garrick would simply revert to the wing, its a different discussion.
The way the game is played these days I'd carry a back on the bench which is Hoppa for mine (for now).
So often a back goes down and teams struggle to recover.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 38 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -6 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -8 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -22 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -30 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -36 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -38 | 0 |