Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Why I place little faith in player stats

Matabele

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
23,080
There was the infamous stats king over at ME and it appears in recent weeks as though Fluff has taken on that mantle for AE.

Here are Menzies' stats for the City vs Country game.

Tackles 28
Missed tackles 6
Hit up 10
Total metres 42

A lot of people would pan those stats. The reality was that he had a blinder and jagged man of the match.

So much for stats ..........
 

ads

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2005
Messages
1,633
It's because stats work in cold numbers. They are an indicator rather than a conclusive proof.

They don't take into acount the impact of the metres, or the tackles, or other onfield organisation stuff. 42 vital metres is much more useful than 100 pointless metres.

So they are useful but not the be all and end all.
 

KaZa

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2004
Messages
2,160
metres is crap. Donald may do nothing the whole game and make a 90 metre bust in the 80th minute and have more metres made than Menzies.
 

c_eagle

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2005
Messages
855
I agree mata. Stat queens like Fitzgibbon and Swain look great on paper but play a bit like Michael Bevan played cricket, to improve their average.
 

byso

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
9,620
I think stats like

Line breaks
Offloads
Missed tackles
tackles
Try Assists
Hitups

Are important.
 

byso

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
9,620
<img src='http://www.alternateeagles.com/byso/General/2005 stats rd9 Monas v orford.jpg' alt='' style='vertical-align:middle; border:0' />

Mata, So what do you think of these stats?
 

Kiwi Eagle

Moderator
Staff member
2018 Tipping Competitor
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
16,097
"Stats are like mini skirts. What they reveal is great,but what they hide is vital"
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,161
Stats pick up the things you miss with the naked eye - the naked eye picks up the things you miss with stats.

However stats are objective and the eye is subjective.
 

Volley

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
4,290
I agree mata. Stat queens like Fitzgibbon and Swain look great on paper but play a bit like Michael Bevan played cricket, to improve their average.
Quit drugsmoking.

I agree with most sentiments, but Kiwi's is probably the best.
 

Matabele

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
23,080
Rubbish Fluffy. Stats can only be viewed within the context of the game. When taken in isolation, as you're prone to do, they're less than meaningless.

Byso, why don't you compare the stats between Orford and Monaghan in the games they played against the Broncos?
 

Blunty

Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Messages
372
Byso, why don't you compare the stats between Orford and Monaghan in the games they played against the Broncos?
beat[/b] Melbourne. Those stats might be interesting to compare.
 

c_eagle

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2005
Messages
855
While I was drug smoking I compiled this list. It shows how much crap a stat like Try Assist is.

Try Assists for the NRL Halves combos

1. Parramatta 21 (Tim Smith 14, John Morris 7)
2. Broncos 15 (Darren Lockyer 8, Brett Seymour 7)
3. Cowboys 12 (Johnathan Thurston 9, Justin Smith 3)
4. Sharks 12 (Brett Kimmorley 8, Adam Dykes 4)
5. Storm 12 (Matt Orford 8, Scott Hill 4)
6. Panthers 11 (Craig Gower 10, Preston Campbell 1)
7. Sea Eagles 10 (Michael Monaghan 7, Michael Witt 3)
8. Dragons 9 (Matthew Head 7, Trent Barrett 2)
9. Bulldogs 9 (Brent Sherwin 7, Braith Anasta 2)
10. Tigers 8 (Scott Prince 7, Benji Marshall 1)
11. Knights 8 (Andrew Johns 4, Kurt Gidley 4)
12. Roosters 7 (Brett Finch 5, Jamie Soward 2)
13. Warriors 6 (Stacey Jones 4, Lance Hohaia 2)
14. Souths 6 (Joe Williams 4, John Sutton 2)
15. Raiders 6 (Jason Smith 5, Lincon Withers 1)

Raiders last? Smith with only 5? Very deceptive...
 

Volley

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
4,290
I was referring to your Bevan pay out. The other stuff I agree with.
 

Kiwi Eagle

Moderator
Staff member
2018 Tipping Competitor
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
16,097
I reckon the biggest waste of time stat is kicking metres.

If your forwards are useless and only make 40m every set,you will have more metres than a guy who has good forwards making 60m a set
 

c_eagle

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2005
Messages
855
I reckon the biggest waste of time stat is kicking metres.

If your forwards are useless and only make 40m every set,you will have more metres than a guy who has good forwards making 60m a set
That's the weakness with the 40/20 rule. Why should a halfback with a forward pack who can get him over the halfway line be penalised. A 50/10 rule should be introduced imo.
 

Kiwi Eagle

Moderator
Staff member
2018 Tipping Competitor
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
16,097
True,would make it a more skillful kick too with only 10m to play with
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,161
Speaking of skill, watching monas tonight - one bounce - less than 2m was the difference between genious and ok. 3 kicks went dead just - but the other kicks were good.

The chase where we kicked it into the ingoal from 10m and only had 4 chasers and they made it out was abysmal.
 

byso

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
9,620
Mata would simply pick and choose. I prefer over the season...........it shows Orfull to be marginally better!
 
Top Bottom